
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Vaibhav Narang,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:451/2014Date of Institution:02.09.2014Date of Decision:19.01.2017 1. Shakti Kondal s/o Sh.Narain Dutt Sharma.2. Sudesh Sharma w/o Sh.Shakti KondalBoth residents of # 222/1, “Basera” Ne...
Case Number: 451
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/554/20151. Lt. Col. Vishal SharmaMrs. Anjana Sharma wife of Lt. Col. Vishal Sharma Both residents of Flat No. 28, 2nd Floor, Palm Grove, Sector 115, Mohali............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/...
Case Number: 554
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:38 of 2016Date of Institution:15.1.2016Date of Decision:6.1.2017Bhupinder Singh Gill s/o Sardar Tarlochan Singh r/o House No.3296, Sector 19D, Chandigarh.….ComplainantVs.1. Ansal...
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :30/12/2016ORDER Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the complainant. Sh. Snehdip Oberoy, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of the judgment “Ambrish Kumar Shukla (NC), he withdraws this complaint with l...
Case Number: 469
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Jai Surya Jain
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 499 OF 2015Jatinder Pal Singh Vs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects (P) Ltd. and anr. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBERPRESENT: Complainant in person.None for OPs.Dated...
Case Number: 499
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj & Kirandeep Kaur
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant has filed his memo of appearance. Counsel for Complainant has made statement in the shape of endorsement on the order sheet itself that she withdraws the present complaint with the liberty to file a fresh complaint with the appropriate authority. In vi...
Case Number: 511
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 487 OF 2016Lt.Col.Harminder Singh Vs M/s Ansal Lotus BEFORE: SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, PRESIDING MEMBER RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBERPRESENT: Ms.Aashi Pawar, Counsel for Complainant.OP ex-parte.Dated : 13t...
Case Number: 487
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 415 OF 2016Narinder Pal Singh Rekhi & anr. Vs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects (P) Ltd. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Ms.Aashi Pawar, Counsel fo...
Case Number: 415
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 416 OF 2016Navjyot Sharma Vs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Ms.Aashi Pawar, Counsel for Complainant.None f...
Case Number: 416
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 417 OF 2016Neeraj Kumari & anr. Vs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Ms.Aashi Pawar, Counsel for Complain...
Case Number: 417
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.