
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 736 OF 2016Dr.Kakoli Biswas & anr. Vs Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd. & anr. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Ravinder Pal Singh, Counsel f...
Case Number: 736
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Peeush Gagneja,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 24/04/2017ORDER When this Commission was not going to interfere, faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the appropriate Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as...
Case Number: 341
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Peeush Gagneja,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 24/04/2017ORDER When this Commission was not going to interfere, faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the appropriate Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as...
Case Number: 342
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Peeush Gagneja,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated: 24/04/2017ORDER When this Commission was not going to interfere, faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the appropriate Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as...
Case Number: 340
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Maninder Arora
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 750 OF 2016Munish Gohri Vs Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Private Limited & anr. BEFORE: S.S.PANESAR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Maninder Arora, Cou...
Case Number: 750
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 664 OF 2016Ravinder Kumar Bajaj & anr. Vs Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd. & anr.BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Ravinder Pal Singh, ...
Case Number: 664
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gautam Pathania, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:470 of 2016Date of Institution:17.08.2016Date of Decision:16.02.2017Mr.Rajinder Singh Pahwa son of Late Shri Gurbax Singh Pahwa, resident of 33, Second Floor, Niti Khand-11 (Near Swaran Jayanti Park) ...
Case Number: 470
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the last date of hearing i.e. 30.01.2017, the following order was passed by this Commission :- “Today four post-dated cheques bearing Nos.163444, 163445, 163446 & 163447, all dated 23.01.2017 in the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- each (totaling Rs.10 Lacs) have been handed ove...
Case Number: 134
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIDICUS LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. PEEUSH GAGNEJA & MR. SNEHDIP OBEROY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2879 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 16/09/2015 in Appeal No. 190/2015 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/964/2016,IA/8023/2015,IA/8024/20151. M/S. ANSAL LOTUS MELANGE PROJECTS (P) LTD.THROUG...
Case Number: 2720
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIDICUS LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. PEEUSH GAGNEJA & MR. SNEHDIP OBEROY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2879 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 16/09/2015 in Appeal No. 190/2015 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/964/2016,IA/8023/2015,IA/8024/20151. M/S. ANSAL LOTUS MELANGE PROJECTS (P) LTD.THROUG...
Case Number: 2879
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.