
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/715/2013Date of Institution:25/11/2013Date of Decision:16/04/2015Dr. Rajiv Vashisht, resident of H.No.3210, TBRL Society, Sector 51-D, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U SM/s Ans...
Case Number: 715
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2015
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj & Kirandeep Kaur
Respondant Advocate Vaibhav Narang
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/133/2014Date of Institution:26/02/2014Date of Decision:15/04/20151. Mr. Raminder Singh son of Sh. Gurmit Singh.2. Mrs. Manpreet Kaur wife of Mr. Raminder Singh, both residents of 521/1,...
Case Number: 133
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2015
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/786/2013Date of Institution:30/12/2013Date of Decision:15/04/2015Harish Kochar, resident of Flat No.2 SF, Palm Grove, Sector 115, Mohali.…..ComplainantV E R S U SM/s Ansal Lotus ...
Case Number: 786
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MEHAR SINGH,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 407 OF 2014 IN CC/144/20141. Shri ASHWANI KUMAR KAURA,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/s ANSAL LOTUS MELANGE PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ...
Case Number: 407
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MEHAR SINGH,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 144 OF 20141. Shri ASHWANI KUMAR KAURA,S/o late Shri Vidya Sagar Kaura, Tower No. 4, Apartment No. 802, Sector-115, Sante Majra, PO Landran, Mohali, Kharar, Landran Road, Near Chapper Chiri,S.A.S. NAGAR (M...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajneesh malhotra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/226/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/01/2014 in Case No. CC/240/2013 of District DF-I)1. Ansal LotusUT...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Kapil GoyalUT...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.] PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESE...
Case Number: 226
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vaibhav Narang Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/28/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd.New Delhi BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBERHON'ABLE MRS. PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERSTATE CONSUMER DISPUT...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ravinder Pal Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/4/20141. Jaswinder Kaur GrewalMohali...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt.Ltd.Chd............Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBERHON'ABLE MRS. PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate SURI & COMPANY LAW FIRM
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 822 OF 2013 IN FA/621/20131. M/S. ANSAL LOTUS MALANGE PROJECTS PVT. LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. JASWINDER KAUR GAREWAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAI...
Case Number: 822
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2014
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/348/20131. Lt. Col. Inderjit Singh Cheema (Retd.)R/o # 2270/B, Sector 47/C, Chd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. P. L. AHUJA PRESIDENT MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL MEMBER MRS. SURJEET KAUR MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I,U.T.CHANDIGARH======...
Case Number: 348
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.