
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/789/2014Date of Institution:02/12/2014Date of Decision:03/05/20161. Arundeep Kaur w/o Sh. Harpreet Singh, resident of Flat No.701, Tower No.9, Orchard County, Sector 115, Mohali.2. Harp...
Case Number: 789
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj & Kirandeep Kaur
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/510/2014Date of Institution:1/08/2014Date of Decision:04/04/20161. Ms. Meetu Sangha2. Col. Jagjit SinghBoth residents of Flat No.21, Top Floor, Palm Grove Apartments, Sector 115, Mohali...
Case Number: 510
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/531/2015Date of Institution:11/08/2015Date of Decision:04/03/2016Anand Sharma s/o late Sh. Ashok Sharma r/o House No.364J, First Floor, Sector 114, Mohali.…..ComplainantV E R S U...
Case Number: 531
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/627/2015Date of Institution:17/09/2015Date of Decision:16/02/2016Harpreet Kaur wife of Sh. Surinder Singh, resident of House No.100, Mona Paradise (Shivalik City), Sector 127, Kharar...
Case Number: 627
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:8 of 2016Date of Institution:07.01.2016Date of Decision:11.02.2016Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office at 1/18B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi – 110002 through its Authorised Signatory.A...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra & Anurag Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:269 of 2015Date of Institution:21.10.2015Date of Decision:14.01.2016Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regional Office at SCO No.183-184, Sector 9-C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Signatory.…&...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra & Anurag Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:270 of 2015Date of Institution:21.10.2015Date of Decision:14.01.2016Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regional Office at SCO No.183-184, Sector 9-C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Signatory.…&...
Case Number: 270
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra & Anurag Chopra
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/271/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/08/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/104/2015 of District DF-II)1. Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Ltd.Chandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Col. Arvinder Singh...
Case Number: 271
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra & Anurag Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/272/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/08/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/122/2014 of District DF-II)1. Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Ltd.Chandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Arvinder Singh Bhat...
Case Number: 272
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:6 of 2016Date of Institution:07.01.2016Date of Decision:14.01.2016Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regional Office at SCO No.183-184, Sector 9-C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Signatory.…&he...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.