
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No.310 of 2017 Date of Institution : 03.05.2017 Order Reserved on : 18.04.2018 Date of Decision : 19.04.2018Ankur Sha...
Case Number: 310
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Surajpreet Singh Kaang Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In the instant case the claim of the complainant is more than 20 lacs as such this Forum has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain and decide this case in view of the judgment passed in Ambrish Kumar Shukla & 21 Ors Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. passed by the Hon&rsqu...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Surinder Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER When confronted with some provisions of Buyer’s Agreement dated 23.12.2013 (Annexure C-3), Sh.Surinder Garg, Advocate, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it again, if need be, at an appropriate stage. Liberty granted. ...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Gaurav Chopra Adv. & Rachit Kaushal Adv.
This application was filed by the applicant/JD for recalling the non-bailable warrants as the applicant/JD have complied with the order. But no proof was produced on record. On 13.12.2017 the counsel for JD took a date for producing such a proof that they have complied with the o...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 58 OF 2017in CC/38/2016Bhupinder Singh Gill Vs Ansal Lotus Melenge Projects Pvt. Ltd. and anotherBEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBERPRESENT: Complainant/DH in person...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shiv Charan Bhola, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rachit Kaushal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:422 of 2017Date of Institution:16.05.2017Date of Decision: 19.09.2017Munish Gohri son of Gulshan Gohri, resident of H.No.555, Sector-8-B, Chandigarh.……Complainant. V e r s u sAnsal Lotus...
Case Number: 422
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/386/2017Date of Institution:04/05/2017Date of Decision:22/08/2017Jasvir Singh son of Sh. Ajit Singh r/o H.No.18, Village Berkalan, Tehsil Payal, Distt. Ludhiana.…..ComplainantV E R S U S...
Case Number: 386
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Rachit Kaushal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:01 of 2017Date of Institution:02.01.2017Date of Decision:19.07.2017Jatinder Pal Singh S/o Late S. Karnail Singh Resident of # 308, Chinar Apartments, Peer Muchalla, Zirakpur, Distt. Mohali (Punjab)&he...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Kashika Kaur,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:16 of 2016Date of Institution:05.11.2016Date of Decision:01.06.2017Orchard County – 1 Residents Welfare Association, Sector 115, Kharar Landran Road, Sante Majra, Greater Mohali throug...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 746 OF 2016Pankaj Goel & anr. Vs Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd. & anr. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Ravinder Pal Singh, Counsel for Co...
Case Number: 746
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.