
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :30/11/2016ORDER Ms. Aashi Pawar, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that she withdraws this complainant with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant woul...
Case Number: 388
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :30/11/2016ORDER Ms. Aashi Pawar, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that she withdraws this complainant with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant woul...
Case Number: 389
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R P Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the Decree Holder wishes to withdraw this Execution Application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the Execution Application is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of th...
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dhiraj Chawla & Ravinder Pal Singh,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 552
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/482/20161. Pankaj GoelChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMB...
Case Number: 482
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/74/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/312/20151. Mukesh GuptaGulmohar Hotel, Ludhiana...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd.SCO 183-184, Sector 9-C, Chandigarh..............
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ramesh Kumar Bamal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/58/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/124/20151. Shri Chandan Sharmas/o late Sh. Jatinder Sharma, H.No. 32, Shresth Housing Complex-3, Balaji II, Zirakpur, now shifted to H.No. H-3/19-D, Krishana Nagar...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:96 of 2016Date of Institution:14.03.2016Date of Decision:26.07.2016Harpreet Singh Sidhu son of Sh.Chanan Singh resident of Flat No.701, Tower No.9, Orchard County, Sector 115, Village Sante Majra, Kha...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:209 of 2016Date of Institution:19.07.2016Date of Decision:21.07.20161. Arundeep Kaur w/o Sh. Harpreet Singh, resident of Flat No.701, Tower No.9, Orchard County, Sector- 115, Mohali.2. Harpreet Singh S/o Late...
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/164/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/05/2016 in Case No. CC/789/2014 of District DF-I)1. Arundeep Kaur701, Tower No. 9, Orchard County, Sector 115, Mohali...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ansal Lotus Melan...
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.