
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mohit Jaggi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to avail any other legal remedy. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three ori...
Case Number: 358
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mohit Jaggi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to avail any other legal remedy. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three ori...
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mohit Jaggi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to avail any other legal remedy. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three or...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mohit Jaggi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to avail any other legal remedy. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three or...
Case Number: 359
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Subhash Chand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rachit Kaushal, Adv.
ORDER Sh. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the judgment debtors by filing his vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Previous cost imposed stands waived of. In this execution application, from time to time, the judgment debtors had paid some amount t...
Case Number: 330
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Snehdip Oberoy Adv. & Peeush Gagneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Rajiv Bhatia, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of OP wherein the earlier counsel or the OP has given his no objection. He has stated that the matter has been compromised. The matter is taken up in the Lok Adalat. As per compromise the counsel for the OP has handed ov...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Snehdip Oberoy Adv. & Peeush Gagneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Rajiv Bhatia, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of OP wherein the earlier counsel or the OP has given his no objection. He has stated that the matter has been compromised. The matter is taken up in the Lok Adalat. As per compromise the counsel for the OP has handed ove...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This is second complaint filed by the complainant seeking refund of the amount paid. It is on record that earlier the complainant had filed a complaint before District Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh relating to the unit, in question, wherein he sought possession of the said un...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
In this case, it is admitted fact that the decree holder/complainant paid an amount of Rs.18,07,462/- to purchase the unit in the project of the judgment debtors. When the judgment debtors failed to give the possession, the decree holder came to this Commission by filing complain...
Case Number: 447
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Subhash Chand & Sapna Khurana Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Clause 5.1 of the Agreement dated 27.01.2014 reads thus :“Subject to Clause 5.2 and further subject to all the buyers/allottee of the Flats in the said Residential Project, making timely payment, the Company shall endeavor to complete the development said Residential Projec...
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.