
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rachit Kaushal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:19 of 2020Date of Institution:15.01.2020Date of Decision:29.05.2020Varun Watts R/o H.No.108, Street No.3, Setia Colony, Near Ganesh Mandir, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan, currently residing at Flat No.124,...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RAKESH KUMAR & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDER PAL SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2207 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 11/04/2018 in Complaint No. 935/2017 of the State Commission Punjab)1. ANSAL LOTUS MELANGE PROJECTS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY 115, ANSAL BHAWAN 16 KG MAR...
Case Number: 2207
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Hoshiar Chand Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:151 of 2019Date of Institution:08.07.2019Date of Decision:19.12.2019Simranpreet Singh Aujla s/o Sh.Karam Jit Singh Aujla, R/o 9516, Joshi Nagar, Haibowal, Ludhiana, Punjab – 141001.…&hell...
Case Number: 151
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RISHI MANCHANDA
Respondant Advocate M/S. JURIDICUS LEGAL & ROHIT GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1403 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 27/01/2015 in Appeal No. 386/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. HARISH CHANDRA POPLANI & ANR.S/o. Sh. Parmanand Poplani, House No. 4962, D-Block, Puncham So...
Case Number: 1403
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RISHI MANCHANDA
Respondant Advocate M/S. JURIDICUS LEGAL & ROHIT GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1403 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 27/01/2015 in Appeal No. 386/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. HARISH CHANDRA POPLANI & ANR.S/o. Sh. Parmanand Poplani, House No. 4962, D-Block, Puncham So...
Case Number: 1404
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:141 of 2019Date of Institution:13.06.2019Date of Decision:31.10.2019Girish Kumar Agrawal S/o Sh.Ram Niwas Agrawal, R/o 82 Manor Dr.Apt #201, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740, USA through SPA Ram Niwas Agarw...
Case Number: 141
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2019
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 83 OF 2015CC/754/2013Krishna RaniVs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Harpal Singh,...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2019
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 82 OF 2015CC/753/2013Brig.Kanwal Jit Singh & anr.Vs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESE...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2019
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 107 OF 2015CC/755/2013Deepak Rai & anr.Vs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None.D...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2019
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 81 OF 2015CC/715/2013Dr.Rajiv VashishtVs M/s Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Harpal S...
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.