
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH======== Consumer Complaint No.:CC/717/2013Date of Institution:25/11/2013Date of Decision:20/10/20151. Ajay Sharma2. Neelam Sharma, both residents of H.No.1069, First Floor, Phase 5, Mohali.…..ComplainantsV E R S...
Case Number: 717
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2015
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. B.M. Mahajan
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:572 of 2014Date of Institution:5.11.2014Date of Decision:30.09.2015Varun Mahajan son of Sh. B.M. Mahajan resident of house No.355, Sector 9-D, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusAnsal Lo...
Case Number: 572
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.189 of 2015(Against the order dated 29.05.2015 in CC/590/2013 of District Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh)Date of Institution:12.08.2015Date of Decision:16.09.2015Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regio...
Case Number: 189
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.189 of 2015(Against the order dated 29.05.2015 in CC/590/2013 of District Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh)Date of Institution:12.08.2015Date of Decision:16.09.2015Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regio...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.191 of 2015(Against the order dated 29.05.2015 in CC/537/2013 of District Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh)Date of Institution:12.08.2015Date of Decision:16.09.2015Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regio...
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.192 of 2015(Against the order dated 29.05.2015 in CC/538/2013 of District Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh)Date of Institution:12.08.2015Date of Decision:16.09.2015Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regio...
Case Number: 192
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajinder Singh Raj, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.193 of 2015(Against the order dated 29.05.2015 in CC/103/2014 of District Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh)Date of Institution:12.08.2015Date of Decision:16.09.2015Ansal Lotus Melange Projects Pvt. Ltd., Regio...
Case Number: 193
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2015
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajvinder Singh Raj & Kirandeep Kaur
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:104/2014Date of Institution:26.02.2014Date of Decision:07.08.2015 1. Col.Arvinder Singh Chahal2. Mrs.Raminder Jit Kaur Chahal, both residents of H.No.28, Defence Officers Enclave, Opp. ITBP Comple...
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2015
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajvinder Singh Raj & Kirandeep Kaur
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:105/2014Date of Institution:26.02.2014Date of Decision:07.08.2015 Mr.Sudhir Rana r/o Flat No.29, Second Floor, Palm Grove Apartments, Sector 115, Mohali. ... Complainant.VersusM/s Ansal Lotus Mela...
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2015
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Rat & Kirandeep Kaur
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:122/2014Date of Institution:05.03.2014Date of Decision:07.08.2015 1. Mr.Arvinder Singh Bhatia2. Mrs.Punam Bhatia, both residents of Flat No.11, 1st Floor, Palm Grove Apartments, Sector 115, Mohali...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ansal Lotus in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ansal Lotus ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ansal Lotus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.