
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. BALWINDER S KALSI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1284 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 22/08/2016 in Complaint No. 217/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MGF HOUSE, 17-B, ASAF ALI ROAD, NEW D...
Case Number: 1284
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3673 OF 20171. AROHIT AGGARWAL & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER For the Complainant :Mr. S...
Case Number: 3673
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasjit Singh Rattu, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:49 of 2017Date of Institution:14.01.2017Date of Decision:18.04.2018Suresh Kumar Sharma s/o Late Sh.R.C.Sharma, resident of 253, Tower 2, 5th Floor, ATS Golf Medows, Perluda Barwala Road, Dera Bassi, M...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
It is stated by Counsel for the complainants that the matter stands settled. To discharge their liability, the Opposite Parties have already delivered two cheques for an amount of Rs.6,68,198/- each to the complainants. In view of above fact, Counsel for the complainants wishes t...
Case Number: 637
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kabir Sarin, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:789 of 2017Date of Institution:10.11.2017Date of Decision:09.04.2018Sh.Sudarshan Bhandari s/o Sh. Ram Dev Bhandari, r/o #531, Phase 3B1, SAS Nagar, Punjab-160059.Sh. Hreetesh Bhandari s/o Sh. Sudarsha...
Case Number: 789
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:842 of 2017Date of Institution:19.12.2017Date of Decision:04.04.2018Nalin Sood S/o Sh. Puran Chand Sood, r/o 1801, Tower 17, South Close, Nirvana Country, Sector 50, Gurgaon – 122 018.Monika Soo...
Case Number: 842
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, it transpires that when complaint was filed, it was not within pecuniary jurisdiction of this Commission. Sh.Deepak Mehra, complainant No.1 wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it again after giving better particulars before this Commis...
Case Number: 759
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
This execution application has been filed by the decree holder, to execute the judgment dated 28.03.2017 in Consumer Complaint No.353 of 2016. The decree holder/complainant has also filed a separate miscellaneous application bearing No.183 of 2018, which is also listed for today,...
Case Number: 443
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 23.03.2018 Date of decision:03.04.2018Complaint No.143/2012IN THE MATTER OF: Sh. Vidush Mehta, 534, first floor, Kanishka Residency, Sector 35, Faridabad-121003 &hell...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:311 of 2017Date of Institution:10.04.2017Date of Decision:28. 02.2018Ajitpal Singh s/o Inderjit Singh r/o H.No.951, Phase 3B-2, Mohali, Punjab.Karanveer Singh s/o Inderjit Singh r/o H.No.951, Phase 3B...
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.