
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN, MR. ARNAV NARAIN, MS. ANUSHREE NARAIN & MR. SAHIL SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. SANGRAM S. SARON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 753 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/04/2016 in Complaint No. 277/2015 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, E.C.E, HOUSE, ...
Case Number: 753
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipin Mahajan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER At the time of arguments, a very serious objection has been raised by Counsel for the Opposite Parties that if we calculate price of the unit and add in it amount of interest, compensation claimed, the total amount would come beyond Rs.1 crore and, as such, this Commissio...
Case Number: 845
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3561 OF 20171. PRITHIPAL SINGH ARORA & ANR.HOUSE NO-3041,SECTOR-35-DCHANDIGARH - 160021 U.T2. TIRATH PAL SINGH, HOUSE NO-3041, SECTOR-35-DCHANDIGARH-160021 U.T...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR M...
Case Number: 3561
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3562 OF 20171. PRITHIPAL SINGH ARORA & ANR.HOUSE NO-3041,SECTOR-35-D, CHANDIGARH - 160021 U.T2. TRIATH PAL SINGH, HOUSE NO-3041,SECTOR-35-DCHANDIGARH-160021 U.T...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR ...
Case Number: 3562
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajat Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Apparently, when we looked into the total cost of the product/unit, total compensation claimed and interest etc., it will cross figure of Rs.1 crore. Therefore, this Commission has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try and entertain this complaint. In view of above, this comp...
Case Number: 45
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parminder Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, very serious objection has been raised by Sh. Gurdeep Singh, Senior Manager (Legal) of Opposite Parties No.1 to 3 qua pecuniary jurisdiction of this Commission to entertain this complaint. He has also moved an application with a prayer that let the compl...
Case Number: 828
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Kumar Bhatia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it again by giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and al...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sumit Narang, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the Opposite Parties that on the last date of hearing, the next date i.e. 30.01.2018 was wrongly mentioned instead of 29.01.2018. According to the Register of the Reader of this Commission, the next date is 29.01.2018 instead of 30.01.2018. Today, none...
Case Number: 734
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the Opposite Parties by filing his memorandum of appearance, which is taken on record. He raised a very serious objection that as on today the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs....
Case Number: 832
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN,MS. ANUSHREE NARAIN, MR. ARNAV NARAIN, MR. MISHRA RAJ SHEKHAR & MR. GAURAV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. SAVINDER SINGH GILL & ANANT AGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1342 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 21/04/2017 in Complaint No. 17/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, SCO NO. 120-...
Case Number: 1342
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.