
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC/1118/2012 DATEPresent :-Counsel for Complainant Ms.Devika Mehra. Authority letter filedcounsel for OP Ms.Aastha LambaIt is stated on behalf of complainant that she wants to withdraw the present complaint on the ground that this F...
Case Number: 1118
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill Adv. & Hoshiar Chand Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:115 of 2018Date of Institution:14.03.2018Date of Decision:07.08.2018Pritam Singh Natt s/o Sh.Balwant Singh r/o Village Rajoana Khurd, Tehsil Raikot, District Ludhiana, Punjab, currently residing in 12...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHMA/384 OF 2018 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO. 115 OF 2018Pritam Singh Natt & anr. Vs. Emaar MGF Land Ltd. and ors. BEFORE: JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT. MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER.Present Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocat...
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Capt Arun Sharma,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for...
Case Number: 240
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Capt. Arun Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...
Case Number: 229
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhinay Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ajiteshwar Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:839 of 2017Date of Institution:13.12.2017Date of Decision:12.07.2018Pankaj Awasthi, aged 44 years, S/o Mr.Jagdish Awasthi, House No.713, Sunny Enclave, Kharrar, Sector-125, Desu Majra, SAS Nagar, Moha...
Case Number: 839
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Tewari, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the decree holder states that the decree holder has already filed execution application bearing No.210 of 2018 under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for non-compliance to the order passed, which is also challenge in this execution application. Counsel ...
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Tewari, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retai...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vertika H Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:791 of 2017Date of Institution:14.11.2017Date of Decision:03.07.2018Abhey Sood son of Late Sh.K.K.Sood, resident of A-3/606, Printers Apartments, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi.Parikshat Mehdudia son of Sh....
Case Number: 791
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. MANISH JOSHI & MR. SUNIL TONI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 496 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 14/05/2015 in Complaint No. 28/2015 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, SCO NO. 120-122, FIRST FLOOR, SECTOR-17-C, CHAND...
Case Number: 496
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.