
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-896/2009 Dated: 18/05/2018 O R D E RCounsel for complainant has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs i.e. Rs....
Case Number: 896
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ajiteshwar Singh, Adv.
Admittedly, the complainant was working with the opposite parties. During currency of his services, he purchased one plot measuring 250 sq. yards for an amount of Rs.60 Lacs. Allotment was made vide letter dated 18.12.2014 (Annexure C-3). Booking amount Rs.2,50,000/- and a sum of...
Case Number: 825
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC.NO.-930/2011 Dated: 16/05/2018 ORDER The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs i.e. Rs.40,50,354/- as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction ...
Case Number: 930
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Capt. Arun Sharma & Ranbir Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:100 of 2015Date of Institution:21.05.2015Date of Decision:14.05.2018Col.Kuldip Singh aged 76 years, s/o Col.Gursaran Singh, House No.147, Sector 35-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u s...
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGAL ALLY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3645 OF 20171. SAURABH JAIN...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITEDCORPORATE OFFICE: ECE HOUSE, 28 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI-110001............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 3645
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate M/S. JURIDICUS LEGAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 824 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 21/08/2015 in Complaint No. 105/2015 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.ECE HOUSE, 28, K.G. MARG, NEW DELHI-1100012. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD., SCO...
Case Number: 824
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill Adv. & Hoshiar Chand Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:723 of 2017Date of Institution:06.10.2017Date of Decision:03.05.2018Biresh Singhal s/o Sh. Yogendra Kishore, r/o H.No.1871, Housefed Complex, Phase – 10, Sector 64, Mohali.……Compla...
Case Number: 723
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill Adv. & Hoshiar Chand Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:675 of 2017Date of Institution:07.09.2017Date of Decision:02.05.2018Makhan Singh son of Sh.Gurdial Singh r/o village Chunni Khurd, P.O. Chunni Kalan, Tehsil Bassi Pathana, Fatehgarh Sahib.Kuldeep Kaur...
Case Number: 675
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill Adv. & Hoshiar Chand Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:676 of 2017Date of Institution:07.09.2017Date of Decision:02.05.2018Mamta Bhardwaj, W/o Sh.Siddharth Bhardwaj, r/o H.No.5747, Nicholson Road, Ambala Cantt. Haryana.……ComplainantV e r s u...
Case Number: 676
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parminder Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:827 of 2017Date of Institution:07.12.2017Date of Decision:25.04.2018Avneet Kaur w/o Sh. Chandeep Singh r/o House No.28-B, Model Town, Phagwara (Punjab) now resident of H.No.60-B, Model Town Phagwara, ...
Case Number: 827
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.