Sugar
Latest Judgments
Total 355 Consumer Court Cases Against Sugar.
D.C.M Sugar Mills V/S Ram chand Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2015
Sugar Factory V/S Vishwambhar Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R K Gupta
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. R/1999/166(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Vishwambhar Singha...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sugar Factorya...........Responde...
Case Number: 1999
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-1999
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2015
Oriental Ins. Co. V/S The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd.
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Mahajan
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/14/5951. The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd.Bhalla Pind, Teh. Ajnala, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Oriental Ins. Co.M.M.Ma...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2015
Oriental Insurance Co. V/S The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd.
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/14/6001. The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd.Bhalla Pind, teh. Ajnala, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Oriental Insurance Co.M...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2015
Nayagarh Sugar Complex Ltd V/S Harihar Biswal
Court Name: Puri
Appelant Advocate Pradipta Kumar Mohanty
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 286
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2015
01-TRIVANI EN. AND IN. LTD SUGAR 02-GANNA MAMANGER STAYA PRAKASH DUBY V/S CHANDRA BHUSHAN TIWARI S/O RAM KRIPAL TIWARI
Court Name: Kushinagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-12-2015
U I I Co V/S U P State Sugar Corporation Ltd
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sharma
Respondant Advocate Alok Kumar Singh
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2005/061. U P State Sugar Corporation LtdA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. U I I CoA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Virendr...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2015
N I A Co V/S JEE Sugar Institute
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravi Sinha
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/1328(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. JEE Sugar Institute a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. N I A Coa...........Responden...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2015
DALMIA SUGAR MILL V/S T.N. VAJPAYEE
Court Name: Sitapur
Appelant Advocate HARIOM SARAN
Respondant Advocate Yatindra Kumar
District Consumer Dispute Redressal ForumColllectrate Compound Infront Of Treasuary OfficeSitapurUttar PradeshComplaint Case No. CC/198/20081. T.N. VAJPAYEE VILL. KAMEHRA MISRIKH SITAPUR BEFORE: For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERFOR JUDGEMENT...
Case Number: 198
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vinod Kumar V/S Gangeshwar Sugar Mill
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vinod Kumar Shahi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/2255(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Gangeshwar Sugar Mill a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Vinod Kumara...........Resp...
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2004
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sugar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sugar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sugar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.