Sugar
Latest Judgments
Total 355 Consumer Court Cases Against Sugar.
manger de kaneria sugar com. ltd captan ganj zila-kushinagar 2-sachiv sahkari ganna samiti V/S sarbjeet s/o rajai
Court Name: Kushinagar
Appelant Advocate ram chand
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2015
Gangamai Sugar Industries Ltd V/S Bhaskar Patil
Court Name: Jalgaon
Appelant Advocate Adv.Daulat Tandale
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 03-09-2015
N I C V/S Shanti Sugar Industries
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate A K Singh
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2013/97( Date of Filing : 28 Jun 2013 )1. Shanti Sugar Industries-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. N I C-............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BL...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2019
Madhukar Sugar Mill V/S Arjan Pilore
Court Name: Jalgaon
Appelant Advocate Pawar
Respondant Advocate
final order District Consumer Redressal Forum,JalgaonComplaint Case No. CC/09/13271. Arjan PiloreMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Madhukar Sugar MillMaharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Nilima Sant PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Kavita Jagpati MEMBER For the C...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2015
Dhampur Sugar Mills V/S Hausla Bux
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate T. H. Naqvi
Respondant Advocate B. S. Bisharia
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/1233(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Hausla BuxA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Dhampur Sugar MillsA......
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2004
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2015
The Dr. Babasheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. V/S The Saisidha Sugar Equipments and Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A. G. Rajput
Respondant Advocate Adv.
Case Number: 247
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2015
Manager S. B. E. C. Sugar ltd. and 1 other V/S Sudheer Kumar
Court Name: Baghpat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2015
United India Ins. Co. V/S The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar Mills
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Mahajan
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/14/5971. The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar MillsBhalla Pind, Ajnala, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. United India Ins. Co.11-A, Lawran...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2015
United India Ins. Co. V/S The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd.
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Mahajan
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/14/5981. The Ajnala Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd.Bhalla Pind, Teh. Ajnala, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. United India Ins. Co.11...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2015
Ramanand Jaiswal V/S Post office Sugar Factory Babhanan Gonda & Others
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr. Uday Veer Singh
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/428(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Post office Sugar Factory Babhanan Gonda & Others-...........Appell...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sugar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sugar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sugar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.