company-name-logo

Sugar

Latest Judgments

Total 355 Consumer Court Cases Against Sugar.

Uttar Pradesh

Vinod Kumar V/S Gangeshwar Sugar Mill

Sugar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vinod Kumar Singh

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/2256(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Gangeshwar Sugar Mill a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Vinod Kumara...........Resp...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 01-12-2004

|

Date of Upload: 28-07-2015

Andhra Pradesh

The Chittoor Co-Operative sugar Ltd.,Chittoor rep.by its Managing Director. V/S M.J.Ramamurthy S/o M.Jayaram

Sugar  

Court Name: Chittoor

Appelant Advocate A.Devendranath

Respondant Advocate G.Rajaram O.P.1

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 14-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2019

Andhra Pradesh

The Chittoor Co-Opatrative sugar Ltd,rep.by its Managing Director V/S A.Dharman

Sugar  

Court Name: Chittoor

Appelant Advocate A.Devendranath

Respondant Advocate G.RAjaram

Case Number: 35

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-09-2019

Andhra Pradesh

The Chittoor Co-Oparative Sugar Ltd. Rep.by its Managing Director V/S G.Venkata Muni Chetty

Sugar  

Court Name: Chittoor

Appelant Advocate A.Devendranath

Respondant Advocate G.Rajaram

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-09-2019

NCDRC

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI BHAGYA LAKSHAMI COOP. SUGAR FACTORY LTD V/S THE YAMAKANAMARADI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,

Society   Sugar  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHARNAGOUDA N. PAIL (AUTH. REP.)

Respondant Advocate MR. SHARANAGOUD PATIL & MR. D. BHART KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 790 OF 2012 IN OP/90/20071. THE YAMAKANAMARADI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI BHAGYA LAKSHAMI COOP. SUGAR FACTORY LTD...........Re...

Case Number: 790

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2014

Andhra Pradesh

1. The Branch manager, HDFC Standard Life Insurance company Limited, Office situated at Opp: Devi Th V/S 1. J. Baby W/o. Late J. Velan aged 36 Years, Occ: House wife, R/o. D.No. 21-644, Sugar Factory Colony, Kalavagadda, Near Chittoor Sugar Factory, Chittoor-517 001.

Hdfc   Hdfc   Sugar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. D. Seshasayana Reddy

Respondant Advocate M/s. S. Gopal Singh & Associats

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/443/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/10/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/48/2011 of District Chittoor)1. 1. J. Baby W/o. Late J. Velan aged 36 Years, Occ: House wife, R/o. D.No. 21-...

Case Number: 443

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

THE GWALIOR SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED V/S ASHOK SIROTHIYA

Sugar  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 118

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

THE GWALIOR SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED V/S DHANANJAY KUMAR

Sugar  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 119

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

THE GWALIOR SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED V/S HARIOM SHRIVASTAVA

Sugar  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 120

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

THE GWALIOR SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED V/S RAMBABU SIROTHIYA

Sugar  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 121

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sugar in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sugar ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Sugar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.