Sugar
Latest Judgments
Total 355 Consumer Court Cases Against Sugar.
THE GWALIOR SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED V/S PACHCHU
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
THE GWALIOR SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED V/S AMAR SINGH
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Manager of Sugar Ltd. Unit V/S Jagat Pal Singh
Court Name: Shrawasti
Appelant Advocate Mr. H.L Pathak
Respondant Advocate Devendra Singh,Dinesh Singh,A.B Srivatava
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2021
KINGFISHER IMNDIA ELEVATOR & AIR CONDITION INDUSTRIES & ANOTHER. V/S VISHNU SUGAR MILLS LIMITED.
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate VIKRAMADITYA BISWAS
Respondant Advocate Ld. Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/57/2013 1. VISHNU SUGAR MILLS LIMITED.8,NETAJI SUBHAS ROAD,P.S-HARE STREET,KOLKATA-700001. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. KINGFISHER IMNDIA ELEVATOR & AIR CONDITION INDUSTRIES & ANOTHER.124,ARABIN...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GANGA SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. V/S UP DAKPAL & 3 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. UDAY VEER SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. BRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 777 OF 2013 IN RP/4902/20121. UP DAKPAL & 3 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. GANGA SUGAR CORPORATION LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING ...
Case Number: 777
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2014
GANGA SUGAR CORPORATION V/S UP DAKPAL & 3 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. UDAY VEER SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. BRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 778 OF 2013 IN RP/4903/20121. UP DAKPAL & 3 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. GANGA SUGAR CORPORATION...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING MEMBE...
Case Number: 778
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2014
GANGA SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. V/S UP DAKPAL & 3 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. UDAY VEER SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. BRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 779 OF 2013 IN RP/4904/20121. UP DAKPAL & 3 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. GANGA SUGAR CORPORATION LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING ...
Case Number: 779
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2014
GENERAL MANAGER, TRIDENT SUGAR LTD. V/S MOHD. MAHBOOB ALI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.S. RAMA RAO
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1223 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1014/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MOHD. MAHBOOB ALIS/O MASTAN SAB R/O HANDOOR VILLAGE , NYALKAL MADNAL, MEDAKA.P............
Case Number: 1223
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2013
GENERAL MANAGER, TRIDENT SUGAR LTD. V/S QAMAR SULTANA @ QAMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.S. RAMA RAO
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1223 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1014/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MOHD. MAHBOOB ALIS/O MASTAN SAB R/O HANDOOR VILLAGE , NYALKAL MADNAL, MEDAKA.P............
Case Number: 1224
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2013
MOHD. MAHBOOB ALI V/S GENERAL MANAGER, TRIDENT SUGAR LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. BALAJI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. K.S. RAMA RAO & M/S. GOPI RAJESH & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3588 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1014/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. GENERAL MANAGER, TRIDENT SUGAR LTD.Madhunagar,ZaheerabadMedakA.P............Petitioner(...
Case Number: 3588
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sugar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sugar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sugar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.