Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1203 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ashok Kumar Khurana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggrwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:607 of 2016Date of Institution:21.09.2016Date of Decision:25.01.2017Ashok Kumar Khurana son of Late Sh.Brij Lal Khurana, resident of House No.145, Sector 46-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV ...
Case Number: 607
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. ltd. V/S Naresh Kumar Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This application has been filed claiming that in terms of order dated 23.09.2016, less amount has been paid by the Judgment Debtors/Opposite Parties. After going through the averments made in the application and documents on record, we are not satisfied with the averments made. ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2017
OMAXE LTD. V/S PARVEEN KUMARI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.S.MALIK
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 03 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 03.01.2017 Date of Decision: 24.01.2017Parveen Kumari daughter of Shri Rajinder Singh Lohchab, resident of House No.1095, Sector 1, HUDA, Rohtak, now at Dwarka...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extn. Developers Pvt. Ltd., V/S Gautam Katyal
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Kaur Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 796 OF 2016Gautam Katyal and anr. Vs M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Ext. Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER HON&rsquo...
Case Number: 796
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2017
HARKESH V/S OMAXE LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.145 of 2014Date of the Institution:26.02.2014Date of Decision:19.01.20171. M/s Omaxe Ltd., 9, L.S.C, Kalka Ji, New Delhi-19, through its Prop. Sandeep Garg.2. M/s Omaxe Ltd., Omaxe House, 7, (Omaxe Con...
Case Number: 145
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
M/s Omaxe Limited V/S Smt.Vimlesh Sant
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate counsel for the appellants
Respondant Advocate Mr.Pawan Kumar, Advocate counsel for the respondents
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. First Appeal No.844 of 2014 Date of Institution: 15.09.2014 Date of Decision: 11.01.20171. Smt.Vimlesh Sant Wife of Shri Ajay Sant, R/o 1459, Sector 23-A, Faridabad.2. Shri Ajay Sant S/o S.J.Kishore R/o 1459, S...
Case Number: 844
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
HARNAM DASS GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED) V/S OMAXE LIMITED & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. EQUITY LAW CHAMBER
Respondant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4398 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 17/10/2014 in Appeal No. 255/2014 of the State Commission Haryana)1. OMAXE LIMITED & ANR.CORPORATE OFFICE 16, LSC KALAJI,NEW DELHI- 110011...........Petitioner(s)Ve...
Case Number: 4398
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited & anr. V/S Surinder Kumar Mehta
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:530 of 2016Date of Institution:31.08.2016Date of Decision:20.12.2016Surinder Kumar Mehta son of Sh.S.L. Mehta, resident of #5, NAC, Manimajra, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omax...
Case Number: 530
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2016
Omaxe Limited V/S Neelam W/o jagdeep Saini
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Shashi Prakash
Respondant Advocate Pankaj karnatak
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.216 of 2016 Instituted on:15.06.2016 Date of order:19.12.2016Neelam wife of Jagdeep Saini son of Ram Kumar, resident of villa no.59, block A, Sector 8, village and post office Shahpur Turk, Omaxe City...
Case Number: 216
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
M/s Omaxe Ltd. V/S Urmila W/o Anand Kumar
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Shashi Prakash
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.217 of 2016 Instituted on:15.06.2016 Date of order:19.12.2016Urmila wife of Anand Kumar, resident of villa no.81, block A, Sector 8, village and post office Shahpur Turk, Omaxe City, Sonepat...Complai...
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.