
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 06.12.2016First Appeal- 124/2014(Arising out of the order dated 03.01.2014 passed in Complainant Case No. 387/2009 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum ...
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 06.12.2016First Appeal- 125/2014(Arising out of the order dated 03.01.2014 passed in Complainant Case No. 387/2009 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum ...
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/835/20161. Ms. Puneet Kooner2702-B, Sec 42-C, Chandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.10 LSC Kalkaji New Delhi ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE...
Case Number: 835
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh Soundh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/833/20161. Shubham Setiachd...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developes P. Ltd.,chd............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBE...
Case Number: 833
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:309 of 2016Date of Institution:30.06.2016Date of Decision:22.11.2016Ankur Gupta son of Sh.Naresh Gupta, C-89, Old DLF Colony, Sector 14, Gurgaon (Haryana).……ComplainantV e r s u sOmaxe C...
Case Number: 309
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/826/20161. Lakhmir Singh Sandhuut...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.ut............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RA...
Case Number: 826
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Abhinav Kansal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 996 OF 2016Brij Bala Walia & anr. Vs M/s OMAXE Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Abhin...
Case Number: 996
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. N.S. JAGDEVA
Respondant Advocate MR. SUNIL MUND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 128 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 22/12/2014 in Complaint No. 36/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. ASHWINI GUPTAS/O. ASHOK GUPTA, THROUGH SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY ASHOK GUPTA R/O. HOUSE NUMBER 65, S...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL MUND
Respondant Advocate MR. NIRMAL SINGH JAGDEVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 22/12/2014 in Complaint No. 36/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. OMAXE LIMITED7, LOCAL SHOPPING CENTRE, KALKAJI, NEW DELHI-...........Appellant(s)Versus1. ASHWANI GUP...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUKTI BODH
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision :17.11.2016Revision Petition No. 131/2016 (Arising out of the order dated 4.5.16 passed in Complaint Case No.393/15 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal ...
Case Number: 131
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.