
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the Opposite Party, which is taken on record. Counsel for the complainants states that the matter has amicably been settled. He has placed on record copy of the settlement deed dated 06.02.2017. Counsel for the complainants states that the complai...
Case Number: 946
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B. S. Toor, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to approach the proper Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vijay Pal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:646 of 2016Date of Institution:28.09.2016Date of Decision:09.02.2017Pardeep Sheoran son of Late Sh.Sajjan Singh, resident of Flat No.202, GH-27, Mansa Devi Complex, Sector 5, Panchkula, now residing a...
Case Number: 646
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:486 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...
Case Number: 486
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:487 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...
Case Number: 487
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:488 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...
Case Number: 488
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:489 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Shashi Kala Gupta wife of Sh. Satinder Kumar Gupta, resident of House No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s ...
Case Number: 489
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. GAGAN CHHABRA & MR. ROHIT PURI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1629 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/11/2016 in Complaint No. 51/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. OMAXE CONSTRUCTION LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGER, OFFICE-PHASE-I,IN FRONT OF SIGVIK FACTORY BHI...
Case Number: 1629
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B. B.Bagga,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
...
Case Number: 497
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Balwinder Singh Kalsi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:497 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:06.02.2017Ms.Parmod Khanna wife of Sh.Vijay Khanna, aged about 65 years.Ms.Garima Khanna daughter of Sh.Vijay Khanna.Both residents of H.No.26...
Case Number: 725
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.