
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAKESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision:10.11.2016 Complaint Case No. 1058/2016 In the Matter of: Navin Kumar S/o Mr. K.P. Yadav R/o E-457, G.K. II, 2nd Floor, New Delhi-110019 ……Complainant Ve...
Case Number: 1058
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate Pankaj karnatak
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.Execution Petition No. : EA/133 of 2016INSTITUTED ON : 28.07.2016DATE OF ORDER : 07.11.2016Krishan Kumar SA/o Sh. Nand Kishore resident of H.No. 11/446, Hem nagar, near Gurudwara, Sonepat through his attor...
Case Number: 133
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Anil Shukla Adv. & A S Kang Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :04/11/2016ORDER Sh. Anil Shukla, counsel for the complainants has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint to file fresh on the same cause of action before the competent Court/Commission. In view of the above, this complaint is d...
Case Number: 915
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANAN BATRA & MR. KUNAL GODHWANI
Respondant Advocate MR. KARAN DEWAN, MS. AANCHAL JAIN, MR. JASBIR SINGH KOHLI & MR. RUPINDER SINGH KOHLI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 872 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 16/04/2015 in Complaint No. 18/2015 of the State Commission Punjab)1. OMACE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD............Appellant(s)Versus1. RUPINDER SINGH KOHLI ...
Case Number: 872
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate HARISH K. GARG
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision :25.10.2016Revision Petition No. 117/2016 (Arising out of the order dated 13.4.16 passed in Complaint Case No.555/2014 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redress...
Case Number: 117
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUKTI BODH
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision :17.10.2016Revision Petition No. 129/2016 (Arising out of the order dated 17.5.16 passed in Complaint Case No.129/2015 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redress...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUKTI BODH
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision :17.10.2016Revision Petition No. 132/2016 (Arising out of the order dated 29.3.16 passed in Complaint Case No.361/2015 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redress...
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2016
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/803/20091. Shikha Das SahuE-174 Spaze Privy Sector -72 Village Fazilpur Gurgaon -122001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe LtdOmaxe House -7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji New Delhi-19............Op...
Case Number: 803
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 987 of 2014Date of Institution: 29.10.2014 Date of Decision : 29.09.2016 1. Omaxe Limited, Omaxe House, 16 Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 through its Chief Manager Sales and Market...
Case Number: 987
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2016
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.