
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Verma
Respondant Advocate Pankaj karnatak
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.371 of 2016 Instituted on:14.09.2016 Date of order:19.12.20161.Vijay Kumari wife of Manoj Kumar son of Gulab Singh,2.Manoj Kumar son of Gulab Singh, both residents of Villa NO.322, Block B, Sector 19,...
Case Number: 371
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Verma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.373 of 2016 Instituted on:14.09.2016 Date of order:19.12.2016Kanta Devi wife of Jai Narain, resident of villa no.258, block A, Sector 8, village and post office Shahpur Turk, Omaxe City, Sonepat...Com...
Case Number: 373
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Verma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.374 of 2016 Instituted on:14.09.2016 Date of order:19.12.2016Kanhiya Lal son of Khillu Ram, resident of villa no.66, block A, Sector 8, village and post office Shahpur Turk, Omaxe City, Sonepat...Comp...
Case Number: 374
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Verma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.375 of 2016 Instituted on:14.09.2016 Date of order:19.12.2016Smt. Shukla Sharma wife of Jai Parkash, resident of village no.257, block A, Sector 8, villa and post office Shahpur Turk, Omaxe City, Sone...
Case Number: 375
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Verma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.376 of 2016 Instituted on:14.09.2016 Date of order:19.12.2016Dr Bijender Singh son of Raghbir Singh, resident of villa no.296, block A, Sector 8, village and post office Shahpur Turk, Omaxe City, Sone...
Case Number: 376
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Verma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.377 of 2016 Instituted on:14.09.2016 Date of order:19.12.20161.Anil Sharma son of Rameshwar Dass,2.Smt. Sunita Sharma wife of Anil Sharma, both residents of villa no.260, block A, sector 8, village an...
Case Number: 377
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nitin Gupta Adv. & Gaurav Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/409/20161. Jasbir Singhchd...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.chd ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEM...
Case Number: 409
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Jain,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No. MA/575/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/846/20161. Maheshinder Singh SodhiChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd.Chandigarh...........Respondent(...
Case Number: 575
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KARTAR SINGH MALIK-1
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 101 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 26.04.2016 Date of Decision: 09.12.2016Parveen Kumari daughter of Sh. Rajinder Singh Lohchab, resident of H.No.1095, Sector 1, HUDA, Rohtak, now at Dwarka, De...
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Navneet Jindal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 709 OF 2016Anuj Gupta Vs Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None for Complainant.Sh.Amit Babbar, Proxy co...
Case Number: 709
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.