
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Yogesh K Puri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
We are of the opinion that evidence can better be led before the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, as the property is situated in District SAS Nagar (Punjab). After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with l...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Deep Grewal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In this case, the unit, in question, is situated at Mullanpur, Punjab and in this manner, evidence can properly be led before the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Accordingly, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint, with liberty to file ...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:768 of 2016Date of Institution:07.11.2016Date of Decision:20.03.2017Harish Bhardwaj son of Sh.A.K Bhardwaj.Sunita Bhardwaj wife of Sh.Harish Bhardwaj.Both residents of House No.3132, Sector 20-D, Chan...
Case Number: 768
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Sharma,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:768 of 2016Date of Institution:07.11.2016Date of Decision:20.03.2017Harish Bhardwaj son of Sh.A.K Bhardwaj.Sunita Bhardwaj wife of Sh.Harish Bhardwaj.Both residents of House No.3132, Sector 20-D, Chan...
Case Number: 827
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ankit Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
As per averments made, it is stated that the basic facilities are missing at the spot. Let the complainant sent a detailed notice to the Opposite Party indicating deficiencies in construction of the unit. If any, such notice is sent by the complainant, the Opposite Party is direc...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:726 of 2016Date of Institution:24.10.2016Date of Decision:27.02.2017Harpreet Singh Dhot son of Late Sh.Niranjan Singh Dhot, #174, Mohindra Complex, Kheri Gujran Road, Patiala, Punjab.……C...
Case Number: 726
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :20/02/2017ORDER This case is taken up today on the written request of the parties. Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, counsel for the complainant has received two cheques of Rs.27456/- and 27457/- from the learned counsel for the OP and appended a note on the first page of the applicat...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 20/02/2017Date of Order: 28/02/2017Complaint Case No. 183/2014In the matter of:Ms. Payal GroverW/o Sh. Kulbhushan GroverR/o 35/19, West Patel NagarNew Delhi-110008 ...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
Sh. Pankaj Khullar, Advocate, Counsel for the Judgment Debtors on getting instructions from Sh. Nikhil Gupta, Senior Manager (Commercial) states that possession of the unit, in question, will be positively delivered to the decree holders/complainants on or before 31.12.2017. It i...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MUNISH GUPTA & MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHINEET TANEJA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 300 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/05/2012 in Complaint No. 66/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. OMAXE LTD. & ANR.Through its Chairman/Managing Director, 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, NEW ...
Case Number: 300
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.