
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate None for complainant.
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI. Complaint No. 350 of 2014. Date of institution: 21.08.2014 Date of decision: 27.03.2017.Lal Deen aged about 55 years son of Shri Kher Deen, resident of Village Ledi, Tehsil Chhachhrauli, Di...
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Akshya Sharma
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI. Complaint No. 930 of 2013. Date of institution: 08.11.2013. Date of decision: 21.03.2017.Hari Ram aged about 53 years son of Sh. Goverdhan Dass, resident of village Mamidi, Tehsil Jagadhri,...
Case Number: 930
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Amerjeet Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh.R.K.Sharma
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 188/161. Balwant Singh VPO Kaller Majra,Guhala,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:S...
Case Number: 188
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Mr.D.S.Jammu
Respondant Advocate Sh.Amit Sudharshan
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 162/161. Ved Parkash VPO,Dandota,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNCheeka,Kaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Mr.D.S.J...
Case Number: 162
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vikas Sharma
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI. Complaint No. 1134 of 2011. Date of institution: 08.11.2011 Date of decision: 10.03.2017.Mimla Devi aged about 40 years wife of Shri Bachana Ram, Caste Hindu Gujjar, resident of Village Ali...
Case Number: 1134
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Subhash Chand
Respondant Advocate D.S.Kamboj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No.1195 of 2011. Date of institution: 30.11.2011. Date of decision: 20.02.2017Mangat Ram Tandon since deceased now represented by his L.R.:Sushma Rani Tandon (wife), resident of 26-A, Professor Colony, ...
Case Number: 1195
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.M.K Nirwani
Respondant Advocate Sh.Karan Gaur
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 199/161. Pawan Kumar Siwan,kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.M.K Nirwani, Advoc...
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Subhash Chander
Respondant Advocate R.K.Kamboj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 1004 of 2011. Date of institution: 21.09.2011 Date of decision: 14.02.2017Sumer Chand Gupta, aged about 76 son of Shri Banarsi Dass, resident of Bawa Colony, Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhri...
Case Number: 1004
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate ROHIN KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 27 of 2014 Date of Institution : 20.01.2014 Date of decision : 08.02.2017 Vinita Gupta aged about 56 y...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Rathore
Respondant Advocate Gulab Singh
Vinod Kumar Versus UHBVNLCC NO.27 of 2017Present: Sh. Pardeep Rathore, Advocate, counsel for complainant. Sh. Gulab Singh, Advocate, counsel for OPs. Today the case was fixed for consideration. Learned counsel for the complainant had made a statement on dated 07.02.2017 that he ...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.