
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Sukhdev Punia
Respondant Advocate Sh.R.K.Sharma
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 343/161. Korri Devi Cheeka.Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNGuhala,Kaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.Sukhdev Pun...
Case Number: 343
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate P.S SHARMA
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBAL Complaint Case No. : 326 of 2013 Date of Institution : 19.12.2013. Date of Decision : 10.07.2017Ankur Ashok Anand aged 34 years son of Ashok Anand r/o H.No.37, Rajinder Nagar, Ambala Cant...
Case Number: 326
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Vivek Berwal
Respondant Advocate Sh.Rahul Gupta
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 308/161. Randhir Singh Amargarh Gamri Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.Vivek B...
Case Number: 308
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Harpal Singh
Respondant Advocate Jai Pal Singh OP No.1 to 3
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 392 of 2014 Date of institution: 11.09.2014 Date of decision: 10.07.2017Manjeet Kaur, aged about 45 years, wife of Shri Kuldeep Singh, resident of # 350 Sector -1, Chandigarh Road Kharar, Punjab, ...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate P.S SHARMA
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 224 of 2013 Date of Institution : 04.09.2013 Date of decision : 03.07.2017 Ashok Gulati S/o Sh. Ram saran Gulati R/o 7-F, New Model Colony, Ambala City. ……. Complainant.Uttar Haryana...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Parveen Shakkarwal
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh OP No.1 &2,Naveen Kaushal OP No.3
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 343 of 2013 Date of institution: 09.05.2013 Date of decision: 23.06.2017Arjun Singh, aged about 48 years, son of Shri Sheo Ram, resident of village Ranjitpur, Tehsil Bilaspur, District Yamuna Nag...
Case Number: 343
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Sushil Kaushal
Respondant Advocate Balwinder Singh
Gian Singh Vs. The SDO (OP) UHBVNExecution No.4 of 2016Present: Mr. Sushil Kaushal, Advocate for complainant/DH. Mr. Pankaj Deswal, SDO (OP) along with Shri Balinder Singh, Advocate. Today the present execution is fixed for compliance of order/judgment dated 11.12.2015 passed in ...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Sushil Kaushal
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 399 of 2014 Date of institution: 18.09.2014 Date of decision: 21.06.2017 Gurdial Singh, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Mam Raj, resident of village Barouli Majra, Tehsil Chhachhrauli, Distric...
Case Number: 399
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate C.L KOHLI
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 257 of 2013 Date of Institution : 01.10.2013 Date of decision : 15.06.2017 Sh. Suman Jain S/o Keshav Chander Jain, R/o 5542, D.C. Road Ambala Cantt.……...
Case Number: 257
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
Respondant Advocate
Jahid Hssan vs. UHBVNLEx. No. 40 of 2017.Present: Sh. Dharamvir Singh, Advocate, counsel for DH/complainant. Today the present execution was fixed for consideration on the point of admission. From the perusal of order/judgment attached with this file, it is evident that the compl...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.