
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate N.S.Saini
Respondant Advocate D.S.Kamboj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 210 of 2012. Date of institution: 29.02.2012 Date of decision: 20.12.2016.Ashok Kumar aged about 35 years son of Shri Lachhman Dass, resident of Village Khurdi, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna N...
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Sukhdev Punia
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramesh Rana
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 129/161. Sukhdev Singh VPO.Lander Keema,KaITHAL...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.Sukhd...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Sushil Kaushal
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No…381 of 2014. Date of institution: 08.09.2014 Date of decision: 16.12.2016 Prem Chand aged about 58 years son of Shri Jhandu, resident of Village Barouli Majra, Tehsil Chhachhrauli, Distric...
Case Number: 381
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Rahul Singla
Respondant Advocate Jai Pal Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No…..465 of 2014. Date of institution: 11.11.2014 Date of decision: 14.12.2016Jai Pal aged about 70 years son of late Gurdayal Singh, resident of village & Post Office Sehla, Tehsil Barar...
Case Number: 465
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Devender Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh.Amit Choudhary
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 125/161. Ram Niwas VPO.Dubbal.Kalayat.Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKalayat,Kaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh...
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate Ajay Shandaliya
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 1174 of 2011. Date of institution: 22.11.2011. Date of decision: 06.12.2016.Krishan Chand aged about 50 years son of Sh. Shiv Ram, resident of Village Udhamgarh, Tehsil Bilaspur, District Yamuna...
Case Number: 1174
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Balbir Singh Rattewal
Respondant Advocate None for JDs.
Ex. No. 65 of 2016.Mohan Singh vs. UHBVNPresent: Sh. Balbir Singh Rattewal, Advocate, for DH. None for JDs. File taken up today on the application moved by the DH through his advocate Sh. Balbir Singh Rattewal and fresh power of attorney also filed by the counsel for the DH. Lea...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate None for complainant.
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 341 of 2015 Date of institution: 16.09.2015 Date of decision: 21.11.2016Satish Kumar aged about 37 years, son of Sh. Faggu Ram, village and post office Sabapur, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna...
Case Number: 341
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Mukesh Sehgal
Respondant Advocate Jaipal Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 829 of 2011. Date of institution: 05.08.2011 Date of decision: 18.11.2016Rakesh Kumar aged about 47 years son of Shri Man Chand, resident of village Kottar Khana, Sub Tehsil Mustafabad, Tehsil ...
Case Number: 829
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Harinder Singh
Respondant Advocate Satish Sangwan
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 153 of 2014. Date of institution: 13.03.2014. Date of decision: 9.11.2016Uma Shashi aged about 65 years w/o Shashi Kumar R/o 143 A/L Model Town Yamuna Nagar. …Complainant.Uttar Har...
Case Number: 153
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.