
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Rathore
Respondant Advocate Balinder Singh
BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NEAR MINI SECTT. YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI.Complaint Case No. CC/28/20171. Ashok Kumar S/o Lahori LalH.No.1395, Yamuna Gali tehsil Jagadhri Yamuna Nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVN Ltd.Vidyut Sadan Sector-6, Panchkula.2...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate BS Chuhan
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh op no.1 &2
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 839 of 2011. Date of institution: 05.08.2011 Date of decision: 06.02.2017 Prem Chand son of Shri Asha Ram, resident of village Mehmapur, Sub Tehsil Sadhaura, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Ya...
Case Number: 839
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate None for complainant.
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 204 of 2014. Date of institution: 05.05.2014 Date of decision: 02.02.2017 Ram Pal, aged about 60 years, son of Shri Sultan Singh, resident of Village Lakkar PO Rampur, Tehsil Chhachhrauli,...
Case Number: 204
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate B.S GILL
Respondant Advocate SARVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 62 of 2012 Date of Institution : 17.02.2012 Date of decision : 30.01.2017 Ram Singh age 68 S/o Sh. Pritam Si...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate H.S GILL
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 64 of 2013 Date of Institution : 25.03.2016 Date of decision : 30.01.20171. Padam Kumar S/o Sh. Sham Lal S/o Sh. Billa Ram, resident of village Koolpur, Tehsil and Distt. Yamuna Nagar.2. Sukhdev S...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Niranjan Saini
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
Jindu Ram Versus UHBVNLCC No. 220 of 2015.Present: Sh. Niranjan Singh Saini, Advocate, counsel for complainant. Sh. Zile Singh, Advocate, counsel for OPs. Counsel for the complainant made a statement that compromise has been effected between the parties and now nothing remains ...
Case Number: 220
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Vinay Verma
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.P Jaglan
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 281/161. Krishan Kumar Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.Vinay Verma, Advocate ...
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2017
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Kamboj
Respondant Advocate Balinder Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 430 of 2015. Date of institution: 01.12.2015 Date of decision: 20.01.2017.Satpal Singh aged about 50 years son of Shri Telu Ram, resident of village Rampur Khader, Tehsil Chhachhrauli, District ...
Case Number: 430
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate R.P.Singh
Respondant Advocate R.K.Kamboj OP No.1&2,Aditya Partap OP No.3
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 253 of 2015. Date of institution: 23.07.2015 Date of decision: 19.01.2017Karam Chand aged about 52 years, son of Shri Karnail Singh, resident of village Kalawar, Tehsil Mustfabad, Tehsil J...
Case Number: 253
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.