
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHAL CHADHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1980 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1179/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BISHAN DASSS/o Shri Jagat Ram R/o House No-66/05,Shahabad Markanda,tehsil ShahabadKurkshetraHa...
Case Number: 1980
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4712 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/08/2012 in Appeal No. 811/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. LALIT PRASAD PANDEYR/o 496/5A, Gobind Garh Farm Colony, JaghadhriYAMUNA NAGARHARYANA..............
Case Number: 4712
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN KUMAR GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3846 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 13/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1791/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUDARASHAN PRUTHIW/o Jaswant Rai, R/o H.No-168, Sector - 14 Sonepat, SonepatHaryana..............
Case Number: 3846
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2013
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Dipsosedo off...
Case Number: 597
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HARI KRISHAN, MR. J.S.K. AGGARWAL & MR. ASHOK KUMAR ARYA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1547 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1688/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HAR CHARAN SINGHS/o Sri Bhagart Singh R/o H.No-675 Panchsheel Colony, Milton RoadSonepatHaryan...
Case Number: 1547
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARESH TYAGI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4155 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 28/07/2011 in Appeal No. 34/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. NARESH KUMAR - SATISH KUMARSatish kumar, through Prop, Mohanlal @ Manoharlal , S/o khajan R...
Case Number: 4155
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SUKHDA PRITAM
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4541 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 01/10/2010 in Appeal No. 1342/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SDO, UHBVN & ANR.Operation, Sub-Division, HUBVNNarwala2. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LT...
Case Number: 4541
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KAUSHAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1874 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1639/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANJAY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD.VILLAGE MOHARA, TEHSIL AND AMBALA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. U...
Case Number: 1874
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIKAS SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1173 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 28/12/2010 in Appeal No. 1909/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SMT. SANTOSH SHARMAR/o. H. No. 3484, Urban Estate, Jind, Tehsil and District JindJindHaryana.....
Case Number: 1173
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3718 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 03/08/2010 in Appeal No. 919/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UHBVN LTD. & ANR.Through its XEN Samalkha DivisionSamalkha2. SDO BEHOLISub Divisional, UHBVNL a...
Case Number: 3718
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.