
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate RAJESH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate SARVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 150 of 2014 Date of Institution : 09.06.2014 Date of decision : 31.08.2017 Jagdeep Rana S/o Sh. Mam Chand R/o H.NO.1617 A Mahavir Nagar, Ambala City.……. Complainant.1. UHBVNL Ltd. th...
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2018
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate K.S.Ahlawat
Respondant Advocate Jai Pal Singh
...
Case Number: 439
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Aditya Garg
Respondant Advocate Sh.Balbir Bansal
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 23/171. Pataso Devi VPO.Baba Ladana,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: Dated : 21 Aug 2017 Final Order / Judgement BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES ...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate JATINDER SHARMA
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 285 of 2013 Date of Institution : 06.11.2013. Date of Decision : 18.08.2017Shri Prem Kumar Dhamija aged about 48 years son of Shri Sant Ram Dhamija, resident of House No.722-723, ...
Case Number: 285
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Harpal Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh.Amit Sudershan
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 178/171. Neha Kalayat,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKalayat,Kaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.Harpal Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Pa...
Case Number: 178
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate B.S Mor
Respondant Advocate Sh.Karan Gaur
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 30/171. Satpal Munna Rehri,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:B.S Mor, Advocate For the Opp. Party: Sh.Kar...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Amit Sharma
Respondant Advocate Rajender Kamboj
Sat Pal Malik Vs. UHBVNCC No.1237 of 2012Present: Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate for complainant. Shri R.K.Kamboj, Advocate for the ops. Today the case was fixed for arguments. At this stage, counsel for the complainant had made a separate statement in which he states that he wants t...
Case Number: 1237
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Dalip Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Kamlesh Rani Vs. UHBVNCC No.680 of 2013Present: Shri Dalip Kumar , Advocate for complainant. Shri Mukesh kumar, CA authorized Representative for OPs. Today the case was fixed for arguments. At this stage, Authorised representative for OPs has made a separate statement in which he...
Case Number: 680
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate D.S DANIPUR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 31 of 2014 Date of Institution : 21.01.2014 Date of decision : Jaswant Singh, age about 60 years son of Shri Bachan Singh, resident of village Dhurali, Tehsil and Distt. Ambala. ……. ...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2017
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Prem Chhabra
Respondant Advocate Sh.Balbir Bansal
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 332/161. Roshan Lal Siwan Road Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.Prem Chhabra, ...
Case Number: 332
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.