
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate SUDHIR GAKHAR
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 226 of 2012 Date of Institution : 24.08.2012 Date of decision : 18.01.2017 Parveen Bala aged 63 years old wife of Sh. Ram Murti resident of house No. 23, Manav Vihar, Near D.P.S. School, Hissar Ro...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2017
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. B.S. Jaglan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vijay Kamboj
Respondant Advocate Jai Pal Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 75 of 2015 Date of institution: 05.03.2015 Date of decision: 10.01.2017.1st ComplaintSushil Kumar aged about 48 years son of Sh. Jai Paul, resident of village Fatehgarh, Tehsil Jagadhri, Distric...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vijay Kamboj
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 75 of 2015 Date of institution: 05.03.2015 Date of decision: 10.01.2017.1st ComplaintSushil Kumar aged about 48 years son of Sh. Jai Paul, resident of village Fatehgarh, Tehsil Jagadhri, Distric...
Case Number: 75
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Complainant Inperson
Respondant Advocate Sushil Garg
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 392 of 2015. Date of institution: 03.11.2015. Date of decision: 03.01.2017.Subhash Chand aged about 34 years son of Sh. Ramkirat, resident of Sunder Vihar Colony, Kansapur, Yamuna Nagar. ...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY MALIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3421 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 17/08/2016 in Appeal No. 702/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAM MEHAR SINGHS/O. SH. CHHOTU RAM, R/O. VILLAGE KHANPUR KALAN, TEHSIL GOHANA,DISTRICT-SONEPATH...
Case Number: 3421
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate P.S SHARMA
Respondant Advocate SARVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 105 of 2011 Date of Institution : 01.04.2011 Date of Decision : 30.12.20161. Roop Chand S/o Nasib Singh2. Ajmer Singh S/o Nasib Singh3. Gurdev Kaur W/o Phool Singh4. Balbir Singh ...
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate S.S.Saini
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NEAR MINI SECTT. YAMUNA NAGAR AT JAGADHRI.Complaint Case No. CC/168/20141. Paul Singh S/o Janak Singh R/o Vill.Marwa Kalan,Sub Teh.Bilaspur,Distt.Yamuna nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The S.D.O. UHBVN Ltd.Sub Division Bil...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate KESHAV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate R.S SAINI
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 80 of 2011 Date of Institution : 10.03.2011 Date of Decision : 23.12.2016Ram Kumar S/o Late Sh. Suraj Bhan R/o village Bichpari Tehsil & District Ambala. ...
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Atul Jaiswal
Respondant Advocate None For OP.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 109 of 2013. Date of institution: 13.02.2013. Date of decision: 23.12.2016Sanjeev Suri aged about 40 years son of Sh. Jagdish Chander Suri, resident of House No. 1263, Sector-17, HUDA, Jagadhri, Di...
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.