company-name-logo

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Latest Judgments

Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

Andhra Pradesh

Employees Provident Fund Organization, Represented by its Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Katta Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o K.Rami Reddy

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Kurnool

Appelant Advocate M.Sivaji Rao

Respondant Advocate L.Viswanadham

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/07/20111. Katta Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o K.Rami ReddyH.No.80, Bannur (Village), Jupadubungla (Mandal), Kurnool District-518 401Kurnool Andhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Employees Provident Fund Organization, Represented by its Reg...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MARUTI SHANKAR WAGHCHAURE & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (NASHIK)

Provident Fund   Maruti   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2825 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/11/2010 in Appeal No. 332/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (NASHIK)Shrii S.S Bhati, Asst Provident Fund Commission...

Case Number: 2825

|

Date of Filing: 24-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 14-10-2011

Chandigarh

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Om Parkash Chugh,

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Vinod Kumar

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 28 of 2011 1. Om Parkash Chugh,S/o Sh. V.R. Chugh, R/o # 1080, Sector 18/C, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Regional Provident Fund...

Case Number: 28

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

HARSHAD KESHAVLAL PANCHAL V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. A.P. SINHA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 30/11/2010 in Appeal No. 1027/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERBHAVISYANIDH BHAWAN, NR INCONME TAX CIRCLE , ASHRAM ROAD, ...

Case Number: 2150

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2011

Andhra Pradesh

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S V.Prasad, S/o V.Ramamurthy

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Kurnool

Appelant Advocate M.Sivaji Rao

Respondant Advocate L.Viswanadham

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/126/20101. V.Prasad, S/o V.RamamurthyH.No.26/285, Near Chinna Market,Kurnool-518 401,Andhra PradeshKurnoolAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerTower No.6, 5th Floor, Vashi Railway Station, Vashi,...

Case Number: 126

|

Date of Filing: 07-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Shankar Upasrao Damke V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Adv Joshi

Respondant Advocate Tanna

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURMiscellaneous Application No. MA/09/292( Date of Filing : 19 Mar 2009 )In1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Raghuji nagar Nagpur...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Shankar Upasrao Damke R/o 72 Kanf...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 26-12-2022

Maharashtra

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER FR MAHARASHTRA & GOA. V/S MULCHAND K.SHAH

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/09/270 1. MULCHAND K.SHAHA1,DEVENDRA APARTMENT,ROKADIA LANE,BORIAVALI WEST,MUM-400092 ...........Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization, V/S S.C. Gabha

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Vinod Kumar

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 15 of 2011 1. S.C. GabhaEX. Manager Gen, R/o # 3198, Sector 21/D, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Regional Provident Fund Commissio...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

K.RAMLA V/S THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

Respondant Advocate

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/10/641(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/12/2009 in Case No. CC/44/2009 of District Thiruvananthapuram)1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERBHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN,PATTOM-P.OTRIVAN...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

S.C. GABA & ORS. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/01/2011 in Appeal No. 322/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERNidhi Bhawan, A2C, Sector-24, Gautam Budh NagarNoidaUtta...

Case Number: 1115

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 23-05-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.