Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Latest Judgments
Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.
VINOD KUMAR & ORS. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR.
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/01/2011 in Appeal No. 322/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERNidhi Bhawan, A2C, Sector-24, Gautam Budh NagarNoidaUtta...
Case Number: 1116
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2011
CHARANJIT SINGH SANDHU & ORS. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/01/2011 in Appeal No. 322/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERNidhi Bhawan, A2C, Sector-24, Gautam Budh NagarNoidaUtta...
Case Number: 1117
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2011
OM PRAKASH CHUGH & ORS. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/01/2011 in Appeal No. 322/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERNidhi Bhawan, A2C, Sector-24, Gautam Budh NagarNoidaUtta...
Case Number: 1114
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2011
Regional Provident Fund commissioner Nagpur & Other V/S Ramesh Bhauji Bhagat
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: Bhandara
Appelant Advocate R M Wadibhasme
Respondant Advocate MR. H. N. VERMA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BHANDARACONSUMER CASE NO. 11 of 17 1. Ramesh Bhauji BhagatC/O Ghanshyamji Dhote Vinoba nagar Tumsar Tah TumsarBhandaraMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Regional Provident Fund commissioner Nagpur & Other Office of ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER V/S K.N. KAPOOR
Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DUSHYANT PARASHAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3777 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 17/01/2005 in Appeal No. 578/2003 of the State Commission Uttaranchal)1. K.N. KAPOORHouse No.J-142, Shivaliak Nagar,Ranipur,HaridwarHaridwarUttaranchal...........Pe...
Case Number: 3777
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2011
SHRI RAMESHWAR GOYAL V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANCHANDA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SUNIL VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 758 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/05/2007 in Appeal No. 1582/2005 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERUJJAIN MADHYA PRADESH -...........Petitioner(s)Versu...
Case Number: 758
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2011
RAMESH RUGHANI V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH MANCHANDA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4481 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 30/07/2010 in Appeal No. 1537/2008 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER7, Race Course RoadIndoreMadhya Pradesh...........P...
Case Number: 4481
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2011
S.C. Gaba V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Geeta Sharma, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Vinod Kumar, Adv. for OP 1, Sh.Santokh Singh, Adv. for OP No. 2
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 346 of 2010 1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund OrganizationNidhi Bhawan, A2C, Sector 24, Gautam Bud...
Case Number: 346
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Charanjit Singh Sandhu V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Geeta Sharma, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Vinod Kumar, Adv. for OP 1, Sh.N.K.Zakhmi, Adv. for OP No. 2,3.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 359 of 2010 1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund OrganizationNidhi Bhawan, A2C, Sector 24, Gautam Bud...
Case Number: 359
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Paramjeet Singh V/S The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Provident Fund Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Neetu Prashar, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Neeraj Sobti, Adv. for OP No. 1, Sh. Neeraj Gupta, Adv. for OP No. 2 to 6, Sh. Subhash Chopra, Asstt. Managaer for OP No. 7
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 313 of 2010 1. The Regional Provident Fund CommissionerBhavishyanadhi Bhawan, SCO No. 5/8, Sector 12, New Mini Secretariat, Karna...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.