company-name-logo

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Latest Judgments

Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

NCDRC

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER V/S MOHAMED YASUF

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJA VENKATAPPA NAIKO

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 319 OF 2012 IN RP/2987/20111. MOHAMED YASUF...........Appellants(s)Versus1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING M...

Case Number: 319

|

Date of Filing: 14-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2012

Maharashtra

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER V/S M RNITIN R. KHEDKAR

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate Haresh Wadhwani Authorised representative

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/1461. M RNITIN R. KHEDKARB-403, PANCHRATNA C.H.S. LTD, OLD NAGARDAS X ROAD, ANDHERI-EAST, MUMBAI-69............Complainant...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

SURESHBHAI CHIMANBHAI PATEL & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AKOTA

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1492 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/10/2011 in Appeal No. 233/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AKOTA28 Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan Wazirpur Industrial Area, D...

Case Number: 1492

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2012

Kerala

P.M.John V/S The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K.V.Karmachandran

Respondant Advocate

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/416(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/03/2011 in Case No. CC/03/130 of District Kannur)1. The Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEmployees Provident Fund Organization,8th & 9th Flo...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 14-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

E.M.ITHAMMA V/S THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

Respondant Advocate

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/569(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/06/2011 in Case No. CC/03/265 of District Kannur)1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERREGIONAL OFFICE,9TH FLOOR,MAYOOR BHAVANNEWDELHIDELH...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 17-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

NIRMAL KUMAR CHHIGAWAT V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3947 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 26/07/2007 in Appeal No. 1178/2006 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONEREMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, M. P., 7, ...

Case Number: 3947

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-04-2012

NCDRC

VIRENDRA KUMAR V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 830 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/05/2007 in Appeal No. 1583/2005 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERTHROUGH REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (LEGAL)...

Case Number: 830

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 23-04-2012

NCDRC

SUBHADRABEN JAYANTILAL MEHTA & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR.

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. PARESH J. MEHTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 116 OF 2012 IN RP/223/20091. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. SUBHADRABEN JAYANTILAL MEHTA & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUS...

Case Number: 116

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 20-04-2012

Kerala

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Kamalamma,Mooankuzhiyil Veedu,Puliyila,Nallila.P.O

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Kollam

Appelant Advocate T.K. Rajalekshmi

Respondant Advocate K.R. Ambili

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Civil Station,KollamKeralaComplaint Case No. CC/05/1551. Kamalamma,Mooankuzhiyil Veedu,Puliyila,Nallila.P.ONedumpana,Kollam ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Regional Provident Fund CommissionerBhavishyanidhi Bhavan,Pattom.P.O.,Thiruvananthap...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Mr. G. Krishnan

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/10/971. Mr. G. KrishnanC-1, 503, Lok Everest, J.S.D. Road, Mulund-West, Mumbai-80.Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 10-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.