company-name-logo

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Latest Judgments

Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

Kerala

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Sreemathy, Thekkilazhikathu

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Kollam

Appelant Advocate B.Ajimole

Respondant Advocate K.R. Ambily

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Civil Station,KollamKeralaComplaint Case No. CC/07/1931. Sreemathy, Thekkilazhikathu Thekkilazhikathu Veedu, Kunnumpurathu Veedu, Mevanakonam, Kalluvathukkal.P.O., Kollam ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 05-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

P.D.Mathai V/S The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K.Ramachandran Nair

Respondant Advocate

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/223(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/01/2011 in Case No. CC/03/204 of District Kannur)1. The Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEmployees Provident Fund Organisation,Regional Offi...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

SMT. KUSUM DATTATARYA WAGH & ANR. V/S THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (NASHIK)

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2917 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/11/2010 in Appeal No. 434/2005 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (NASHIK)Shri S,S Bhati, Asst Provident fund Commiss...

Case Number: 2917

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2011

NCDRC

KISHAN LAXMAN THORAT & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (NASIK)

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2967 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/11/2010 in Appeal No. 1151/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (NASIK)28, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 'Wazirpur Indrsutri...

Case Number: 2967

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2011

NCDRC

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR. V/S SURESH KUMAR VISHWAKARMA

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner   Suresh   Suresh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2142 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/11/2010 in Appeal No. 1248/2009 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SURESH KUMAR VISHWAKARMAR.N TAGORE MARG, TILAK WARD, LALCHOWKI, KHANDWAMADHYA PARDESH.....

Case Number: 2142

|

Date of Filing: 20-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2011

NCDRC

M.P. SURESH KUMAR V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner   Suresh   Suresh  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. P. RAMESH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3254 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 28/03/2007 in Appeal No. 704/2003 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERSUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, NO. 18, SHREE COMPLEX MADURAI ROAD...

Case Number: 3254

|

Date of Filing: 28-09-2007

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2011

NCDRC

NAYASHEEL KUMAR AHUJA V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2686 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/03/2011 in Appeal No. 2469/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERShri S.S Bharti, Assitant Provident Commissioner (Legal)...

Case Number: 2686

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2011

Chandigarh

Vinod Kumar Chandra V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms. Geeta Sharma, Adv. for the appellants

Respondant Advocate Sh.Vinod Kumar, Adv. for resp. no.1, Sh.H.P.Verma, Adv. for resp.2 & 3

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 151 of 2011 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEmployees Provident Fund Organization, Nidhi Bhawan, A-2, C, Sector -24, Gauta...

Case Number: 151

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Lal Chand Bali V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms. Geeta Sharma, Adv. for the appellants

Respondant Advocate Sh.Vinod Kumar, Adv. for resp.1, Sh.Hari Pal Verma, Adv. for resp. 2 & 3

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 168 of 2011 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEmployees Provident Fund Organization, Nidhi Bhawan, A-2, C, Sector 24, Gautam...

Case Number: 168

|

Date of Filing: 30-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Sh. Satya Pal Mohal V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms. Geeta Sharma, Adv. for the applicants/appellants

Respondant Advocate Sh.Vinod Kumar, Adv. for resp.1, Sh.Hari Pal Verma, Adv. for resp. 2 & 3

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 179 of 2011 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEmployees Provident Fund Organization, Nidhi Bhawan, A-2,C, Sector -24, Gautam...

Case Number: 179

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.