
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 28/03/2016ORDER Sh. Jaswant Rai Saini complainant No.1 and on behalf of complainant No.2 has made the following statement, recorded separately: - “Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the compla...
Case Number: 205
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 23/03/2016ORDER Brig. B.S. Taunque, complainant No.2 has made the following statement, recorded separately: - “I do not press this complaint as the amount exceeds Rs.20 lacs. This complaint be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainants reserve their right to ...
Case Number: 192
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 29/2/2016Revision Petition – 104/2015M/s Omaxe Ltd.7, Local Shopping Centre,Kalkaji, New Delhi. …RevisionistVersusSmt. Vimlesh SharmaW/o Sh. Dinesh Chan...
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Devinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 121 OF 2016Monika Mittal & anr. Vs M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Devinder Kumar, Counsel f...
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2016
Court Name: Mathura
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer ForumMathuraUttar PradeshComplaint Case No. CC/145/20151. SMT.MEENA GUPTAMATHURA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. OMAXE INTERNITIMATHURA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. SHRI RAJ BAHADUR SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAMBABU KEWAT MEMBER For the Complaina...
Case Number: 145
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Adv. Ankit Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/127/20161. Somya AggarwalR/o H.No. 3324, Sector 50-D, Chandigarh through GPA Holder Mrs. Brij bala wife of Sh. K.K. Aggarwal Resident of House No. 3324, Sector 50-D, Chandigarh..............
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/268/20101. Surinder Kumar Malhotra 6/214 1st Floor Geeta Colony Delhi-31...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji new Delhi-19............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 268
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 1058 of 2015Date of Institution: 10.12.2015Date of Decision : 17.02.2016M/s Omaxe Limited, Omaxe House, 7, Local Shopping Complex, Kalkaji, New Delhi.Through its Authorized Representative namely Sh....
Case Number: 1058
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ravi Shankar Sood
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 795 OF 2015Munish Karol Vs Omaxe Chandigarh Extension (P) Ltd.BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Complainant in person.Sh.Bhupender Singh, Proxy counsel ...
Case Number: 795
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2016
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Manish Joshi, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:356 of 2015Date of Institution:30.12.2015Date of Decision:10.02.2016Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited, having its Regional Office at 143-144, First Floor, Sector 8-C, Madhya Marg, Chandiga...
Case Number: 356
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.