
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/375/20081. Sultan Singh Village Rewal Khanpur P.O Najafgarh New Delhi-43...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji new Delhi-19............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 375
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate M.S. RANA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.84 of 2015 Instituted on:12.03.2015 Date of order:03.11.2015Harbir Singh Dahiya son of Shri Ram Singh, r/o 2342, Sector 15, Sonepat. …Complainant. VersusOmaxe Ltd. 7 Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji...
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate sh.Vansh Malhotra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.211 of 2015Date of Institution01.09.2015Date of Decision12.10.2015Rajesh Makanwal son of Sh.B.S.Makanwal, resident of House No.168, Old Housing Board Colony, Phase-I, Baddi (H.P.).Permanent ad...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2015
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Narinder Chhibba
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Complaint case No. : 663 of 19.09.2014Date of order : 21.09.20151.Shashi Gupta aged 55 years w/o Sh.Subhash Gupta2.Mayank Gupta aged 26 years son of Sh.Subhash Gupta Residents of 65-I, Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana.….. Complai...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate MANNU MALIK
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.291 of 2014 Instituted on:04.11.2014 Date of order:17.09.2015Hari Kishan Jindal son of RamSingh Jindal, r/o H.No.47, Chardham Apartments, Sector 9, Rohini, Delhi-85 through his attorney Shri Rajesh son o...
Case Number: 291
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate K.K. MALIK
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SONEPATExecution petition No. EA/65/05.05.2015Complainants No.482Of 2013Date of Order: 09.09.2015Ramesh Kumar S/o Sube Singh, R/o Village Shahpur Truck, Tehsil & District Sonepat, Haryana.…………&h...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2015
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Complaint No. 921 of 2010. Date of Institution: 03.12.2010 Date of Decision: 18.08.2015Ashish Agarwal s/o Shri N.P.Agarwal, R/o...
Case Number: 921
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/632/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/601/2010 of District South II)1. M/S OMAXE LTD.7, LSC, KALKAJI, NEW DELHI-110019............Appellant(s)Versus1. SUMIT...
Case Number: 632
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu malik
Respondant Advocate AJAY GARG
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.176 of 2014 Instituted on:16.07.2014 Date of order:21.08.2015Smt. Kailash Kumari wife of Shri Rajesh, r/o H.No.835, Sector 14, Sonepat.…Complainant. Versus1.M/s Omaxe Ltd. Regd. Office, 7 Local Sh...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RANBIR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 252 of 2015Date of Institution: 17.03.2015Date of Decision : 23.07.2015Vandna Sahney w/o Sh. Vinish Sahney, Resident of House No.1396, Sector-15, Sonepat (Haryana). Appellant-ComplainantVersusOmaxe ...
Case Number: 252
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.