Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1203 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
OMAXE LTD. V/S HARBIR SINGH DAHIYA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.S.RANA
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. A/1091/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/11/2015 in Case No. 84/2015 of District Sonipat)1. HARBIR SINGH DAHIYAS/O SH. RAM SINGH R/O 2342, SECTOR 15, SONEPAT...........Appellant(s)Versus1. OMAXE LTD.7, LOCAL SHOPPING CENRE KALKAJI NEW DELHI-19.......
Case Number: 1091
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2016
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Dr. Divya Dahiya
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Ghanghas Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:57 of 2016Date of Institution:12.02.2016Date of Decision:15.07.2016Dr. Divya Dahiya D/o Dr. Bhim Singh Dahiya R/o #2073, Sector 21, Panchkula – 134116 (presently working as Associate Professor, ...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2016
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Dev. Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr. Madan Lal Taneja
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.:21 of 2016InConsumer Complaint No.:153 of 2015Date of Institution:01.03.2016Date of Decision:28.06.2016Mr. Madan Lal Taneja S/o Sh. Radhu Ram, #3065/1, Sector 40-D, Chandigarh.Smt. Bimla Taneja...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2016
OMAXE Chandigarh Extn. Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajan Mehndiratta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ramandeep Singh Pandher
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/108/20161. Rajan Mehndirattas/o Sh. Shori Lal Mehndiratta., Promila Mehndiratta w/o Sh. Shori Lal Mehndiratta Both residents of H.No. 2030, Sector 70, SAS Nagar (Mohali), Presently residents of H.No. 2...
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Monika Mittal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/77/20161. Monika Mittalwife of Sh. Pardeep Mittal, Pardeep Mittal son of Parkash Chand Mittal, Both residents of H.No. 91, Sector 9, Panchkula............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Ext...
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
M/s Omaxe Limited V/S Krishan Kumar S/o Nand Kishore
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.01 of 2016 Instituted on:01.01.2016 Date of order:16.06.2016Krishan Kumar son of Nand Kishore, resident of H.No.11/446, Hem Nagar, near Gurudwara Sonepat through his attorney Rajesh son of Ram Swroop res...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2016
Omaxe Chandigarh V/S Ankur Gupta
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parveen Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 15/06/2016ORDER Sh. Parveen Gupta, counsel for the complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately: - “Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves his right t...
Case Number: 411
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shellender Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasbir Singh Punia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:311 of 2015Date of Institution:21.12.2015Date of Decision:10.06.2016Shellender Singh S/o Sh. Raj Singh R/o H.No.1821-F, Sector 7-C, Chandigarh.……Complainant.VersusM/s. Omaxe Chandigarh E...
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2016
The Chairman and Managing Director, OMAXE Ltd. V/S Ashok Kumar Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anamika Mahra
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/87/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/02/2016 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/153/2014 of District DF-I)1. Ashok Kumar SharmaSharma S/o Late Sh. Des Raj Sharma r/o H.No. 5482/2, Modern Housing Complex, m...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Ltd. V/S Prem Chand Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
At the time of arguments, this matter has amicably been settled. It is agreed that the Opposite Parties shall refund the amount paid by the complainant with 10.50 % interest from the respective dates of deposits made. Besides that, the Opposite Parties shall also make payment of ...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.