
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. R.K. Sapra
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ajay Dua
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/15/2221. Dr. Rajesh JaleDr. Rajesh Jale S/o Sh. Chand Ram R/o Kath Mandi Gohana District Rohtak ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Construction Omaxe Construction Ltd.City Rohtak. .........
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/174/20161. Shashi Kala GuptaH.No.1, Sector 12, Panchkula...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.10 LSC Kalka Ji , New Dehi -110019, through its Managing Directo...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/175/20161. Shashi Kala GuptaH.No. 1, Sector 12, Panchkula...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.10 LCS Complex Kalka Ji, New Delhi 110019, through its M.D./Pri...
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/183/20161. Shashi Kala GuptaH.No. 1, Sec 12 Panchkula...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.10 LSC Kalkaji New Delhi 110019............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/184/20161. Shashi Kala GuptaH.No. 1, Sec 12, Panchkula...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.10 LSC Kalka Ji New Delhi 110019............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate Mujnish Gupta,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:610 of 2015Date of Institution:20.10.2015Date of Decision:29.07.20161] Sushila Sharma w/o Sh.Ashwani Sharma, R/o #3450, Sector 23-D, Chandigarh.2] Anubhav Sharma, s/o Sh.Ashwani Sharma...
Case Number: 610
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ankit Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:105 of 2016Date of Institution:17.03.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Somya Aggarwal, r/o H.No.3324, Sector 50-D, Chandigarh, through GPA Holder Mrs. Brij Bala wife of Sh.K.K.Aggarwal resident of House...
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:113 of 2016Date of Institution:22.03.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Divanshu Jain S/o Sh. Narinder Kumar Jain.Rohini Jain d/o Sh. Narinder Kumar Jain, through its attorney Mrs. Shilpa Jain w/o Sh.Div...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rupali S. Verma Adv.
Respondant Advocate sh. Munish Gupta, Adv.
It is stated that the matter has amicably been settled. Sh. Munish Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for Opposite Parties No.1 & 2 states that the entire amount deposited by the complainant shall be returned with interest @8% p.a. It is further stated that an amount of Rs.10 Lacs will...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A Tandon
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.