Uhbvn
Latest Judgments
Total 555 Consumer Court Cases Against Uhbvn.
UHBVN LTD V/S SANJEEV KUMAR
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate R.K JINDAL
Respondant Advocate SARAVJEET SINGH
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 95 of 2011 Date of Institution : 18.03.2011 Date of Decision : 30.09.2016Sanjeev Kumar S/o Kala Ram Gauri R/o villae Tundli P.O. Kalarheri Tehsil and District Ambala. ...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2016
UHBVN LTD V/S KARAM SINGH
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP MISHRA
Respondant Advocate R.S.SAINI
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 172 of 2011 Date of Institution : 26.05.2011 Date of Decision : 27.09.2016Karam Singh ...
Case Number: 172
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2016
UHBVN Ltd. V/S Ved Parkash
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Vinay Pal
Respondant Advocate Vikas
Case Number: 283
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2016
UHBVN Ltd. V/S Kailash Mehta S/o Ram Lal Mehta
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate None for complainant.
Respondant Advocate Satish Sangwan
Kailash Mehta vs. UHBVNLCC No. 116 of 2012Present: None for the complainant. Sh. Satish Sangwan, Advocate, counsel for OPs. Case called several times since morning. It is 3.30 P.M. but none appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of order sheet, it is appraised t...
Case Number: 116
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2016
UHBVN Ltd. V/S Naresh Kumar S/o Ram Rekha Alias Ram Parkash
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Sher Singh Panjeta
Respondant Advocate Satish Sangwan
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 201 of 2015. Date of institution: 10.06.2015. Date of decision: 08.09.2016.Naresh Kumar aged about 40 years son of Shri Ram Rakha alias Ram Parkash, resident of Camp Yamuna Nagar now at present Nare...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2016
Executive Engineer Division UHBVN ltd. V/S Mukesh Sharma S/o Madan Mohan
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Sachin Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate Dharamvir Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 1183 of 2011. Date of institution: 28.11.2011. Date of decision: 05.09.2016.Mukesh Sharma aged about 45 years son of Sh. Madan Mohan resident of H. No. 344/17, Adarsh Nagar, Camp, Yamuna Nagar. ...
Case Number: 1183
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2016
UHBVN V/S Rajinder Kumar
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.B.N.Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh.R.S Dhull
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 90/151. Rajinder Kumar Kurar,Kalayat,Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNKalyat,Kaithal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jagmal Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MS. Harisha MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh.B...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-09-2016
UHBVN V/S Amrik Singh S/o. Gajender Singh
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Ramesh Kumar Verma
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
Amrik Singh vs. UHBVNL.CC No. 368 of 2014.Present: Sh. Ramesh Kumar Verma, Advocate, counsel for complainant. Sh. Zile Singh, Advocate, counsel for OPs. Today the case was fixed for evidence of complainant. However, counsel for the complainant made a statement that he does not w...
Case Number: 368
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
UHBVN Ltd. V/S Balak Ram S/o Prabhu Ram
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate K.S.Ahlawat
Respondant Advocate
Present: None for the applicant. Today the case was fixed for consideration on the miscellaneous application. However, none appeared on behalf of the applicant, even the main execution titled as Balak Ram Versus UHBVNL bearing execution No. 45 of 2015 has been disposed of being f...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2016
UHBVN Ltd. V/S Bhagwati Charan S/o Satpal
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Complainant Inperson
Respondant Advocate
Bhatwati Charan vs. UHBVNLCC No. 296 of 2016.Present: Sh. Bhagwati Charan complainant in person. Complainant made a statement that there is some technical defect in the present complaint, so, he withdraws the same seeking permission to file a fresh one after rectification. In vi...
Case Number: 296
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvn in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvn ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvn under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.