company-name-logo

Telecom

Latest Judgments

Total 3921 Consumer Court Cases Against Telecom.

Kerala

Junior Telecom Officer V/S Prakash J Chittilappilly

Telecom  

Court Name: Trissur

Appelant Advocate A D Benny

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/14/232( Date of Filing : 05 May 2014 )1. Prakash J Chittilappilly-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Junior Telecom Officer-............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2022

Kerala

Nokia India Pvt.Ltd.,Nokia Telecom V/S A.Jayarajan

Nokia   Telecom  

Court Name: Kannur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKANNURComplaint Case No. CC/89/20141. A.JayarajanChairman KGEC Pvt.Ltd.,Valapattanam,p.o.Pappinissery,Residing at Janaki Sadanam,P.o.Mundayad,Kannur District-670591............Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia India Pvt.Ltd.,Nokia TelecomSEZ SIP...

Case Number: 89

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Punjab

Shiv Bhole telecom V/S Karan singh

Telecom  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Vikas Singla

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/1881. Karan singhson of Sh.Manmohan ingh r/o 2/82,Guru Gobind singh nagar Barnala road, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Punjab

M/s Bhagwati Telecom V/S Mangal Singh

Telecom  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate S.S.Sandhu

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/21. Mangal Singhson of sukhcharan singh r/o Maur MandiBathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Bhagwati Telecomthana roa...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 01-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Kapish V/S Swipe Telecom

Telecom  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/172/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Swipe TelecomUT BEFORE: SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH     &#160...

Case Number: 172

|

Date of Filing: 01-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Punjab

M/s Mukhi Telecom V/S Jagdeep Singh Chauhan

Telecom  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhagla

Respondant Advocate Sh.Navdeep Singh Sidhu, OP No.1.

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/13/3891. Jagdeep Singh Chauhansonof Sh.Chand singh r/o H.No.16426,st No.17/1 -B,Guru Gobind singh nagar, Bathinda...........Comp...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

TELECOM DISTRICT MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION V/S BRIJMOHAN CHOTULAL MOR

Telecom  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. CHETAN LOKUR

Respondant Advocate MR. JAYENDRA & MR. RITESH SHARMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3879 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/03/2013 in Appeal No. 508/2000 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. BRIJMOHAN CHOTULAL MORTHROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE CHANDRASHEKHAR MOR, S/O BRIJMOHAN MOR, R/...

Case Number: 3879

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2014

Delhi

SEEMA TELECOM V/S VINEET

Telecom  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92CC No.267/14:In the Matter of:Sh. Vineet JainR/o. A -11/45, Lane No.3, West Azad Nagar,Delhi-110 051ComplainantVsM/s. Seema Telecom 7/...

Case Number: 267

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2015

Punjab

Midha Telecom V/S Neeraj

Telecom  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate R.D.Goyal

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/14/1851. Neerajson of Pwan kumar r/o 20491-B, St.No.13, Ajit road, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Midha TelecomAmrik singh road, Near Band Box, Gole Diggi Bathnd through its Prop.2. ADEV Electronics20, Krishana market,Bibiwala road, Bathinda3. son...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Punjab

Naveen Telecom V/S Puran Chand

Telecom  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Faqir Chand

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/14/1421. Puran Chand son of Vasu Ram r/o Gali No.1 near Bikaner Railway crossing,Hari nagar, lal singh Basti, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Naveen TelecomQila road, Bathinda through its Partner/prop.2. Karbonn customer care servicesD-170, Okhla I...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 10-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telecom in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telecom ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Telecom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.