
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv.
Respondant Advocate Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/02/638(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/01/2002 in Case No. CC/00/391 of District Nagpur)1. Vitthal S/o Rameshwar Mundrs,R/o A-2 / 1 Vrindavan Housing Society, Chitnis Marg, Civil Lin...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2002
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Ankush Singla
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/3251. Inderpal singhAdvocate son of Sh.Kartar singh son of Sewa singh r/o Gli Durga mandir wali Goniana mandiBathinda...........
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dibrugarh
Appelant Advocate SRI VIJAY PANDEY
Respondant Advocate SRI RISHIRAJ BOROOAH
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, DIBRUGARHComplaint Case No. CC/9/20131. SMTI ROSEMARY BORAH. NO. 235, ASRA COTTAGE, BOIRAGIMOTH, P.O. & P.S. & DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RELIANCE TELECOM LIMITEDH BLOCK, 1st FLOOR, DHIRUBAHI AMBANI KNOWLEDGE CITY, ...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2016
Court Name: Purulia
Appelant Advocate P.Ray
Respondant Advocate A.Sarkar
...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate None
Respondant Advocate None
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/06/404(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/06/1999 in Case No. cc/1999/142 of District Amravati)1. Praveen s/o Nandkishor Kalantri,r/o 315, 3rd Floor,vishal Gad Appartment, Jaffergin Plo...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Wardha
Appelant Advocate DESHMUKH
Respondant Advocate R.M.GURU
DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSEWAGRAM ROADNEAR YASHWANT COLLEGEWARDHA-442001MAHARASHTRA (PH.NO.07152-243550 )Complaint Case No. CC/48/20121. ASHOK GIRDHARILAL CHANDAKARVIWARDHAMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GENERAL MANAGER,WARDHA TELECOMWARDEHAWARDHAMAHARA...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nagdeve
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/03/271(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. through Telecom District Manager TRA Unit,C.T.O.Compound,Akola BEFORE:HON'AB...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate A.S.Sekhon
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/2321. Ajay Kumarson of Chanderpa r/o Guru Nanak Dev nagar, opp.Malwa college near NFL Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh. Bhupinder Rana
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 12/141. S.P. Kataria karnal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s ABC Sach Telecom Pvt. LtdKarnal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERBEF...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2015
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. NO. 468/14Shri S.K. Kammod, Defence OfficerDQA(N)/ DGQAMinistry of DefenceWest Block-V, RK PuramNew Delhi- 110006VsM/s Manpreet T...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2020
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telecom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telecom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Telecom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.