
Court Name: Jaunpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 284
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV LAHANE
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/01/1120(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/05/2001 in Case No. CC/358/2000 of District Buldana)1. MADHUKARRAO S/O LAXMAN PAGRUTPAHURZIRA TQ. SHEGAONDISTT. BULDHANA BuldhanaM.S.............
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2001
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/02/538( a )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. The District Telecom EngineerTeecommunication Department, Amaravati2. The Sub Divisional Officer,...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2002
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution : 7.10.14Case. No.DF-III/656/2014/ Date of order : 2.6.16In the matter of :-S...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. U.C. MITTAL & MR. ANKUR MITTAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3576 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 16/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1245/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. TELECOM DISTRICT MANAGER & 2 ORS.-PILIBHITU.P2. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (PLANNING),OFFICE OF...
Case Number: 3576
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2014
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Chander Mohan
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/2231. Subash Chanderson of Budh Ram r/o H.6969 Guru Nanak Pura Mohalla Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Allied Telec...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2731 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/03/2012 in Appeal No. 245/2012 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. SHIRISHKUMAR MAYACHAND MODIR/o Modi Kunj,Amri Road,Palanpur, Ta. PalanpurBanaskanthaGujarat.......
Case Number: 2731
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHAY U. KULARWAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2512 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 23/09/2013 in Appeal No. 635/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. MILIND VIKRAM LOHAKAREGADHAGE NAGAR, NAGINA BAGH WARD, CHANDRAPUR, TAH & DISTRICT : CHANDRAP...
Case Number: 2512
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate Ms. Kiran Suri & Aparna Mattoo
Respondant Advocate MR. P.S. SHETTY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 288 OF 20021. KAVERI TELECOM LTD.Plot No 31-36, 1st Main 2nd Stage, Arakere Mico Layout Bannerghatta Main RoadBangalore 560 076...........Complainant(s)Versus1. VIJAYA BANK & ANR.SOUTH END ROAD BRANCH SOUT...
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2002
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv.
Respondant Advocate Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/02/1465(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, through its General Manager ( Nagpur Telecom ) O/o P. G. M. Telecom Telecom...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2002
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telecom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telecom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Telecom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.