
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate SHRI. GOURANG NALAWALA
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi HospitalParel, Mumbai-400 012 Complaint Case No. CC/14/2021. MR. BALWANT SUTHAR349 A 45 SORAHB CHAWL N.M. JOSHI MARG, MUMBAI 400011MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA......
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/4511. Makhan Lalson of Labh Ram r/o shoop no. 14-B, Grain,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Naresh TelecomHazirattan ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II.8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/259/20141. ANUP PATRA71, RAJA RAJ BALLAV STREET, KOLKATA-700003, P.S-SHYAMPUKUR............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. S4U JAISWAL TELECOM & OTH...
Case Number: 259
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Mr. R.D Singh & U.P Singh
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/38/2011( Date of Filing : 03 May 2011 )1. Kaushik PalitH.No 104 , Yubraj Apartment , Near Loyala B.E.D Collage , Hurlung , P.O & P.S. Telco , JamshedpurPurbi SinghbhumJharkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Neha Telecom , Proprietor Azad M...
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2019
Court Name: North
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ROOM NO.2, OLD CIVIL SUPPLY BUILDING,TIS HAZARI, DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/314/20141. RAJENDER SINGHCHAMBER NO-17, BLOCK-L, TIS HAZARI COURT, DELHIDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DRISHTI TELECOM CENTRESHOP NO-53, TIS HAZARI, NEAR TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHIDELHI............O...
Case Number: 314
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVESH AGNIHOTRI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 832 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 06/02/2009 in Appeal No. 340/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. V.V. TELECOMV.V. Telecom. UGD-15 Secound FLoor, Somdutt Plaza . the Mall. Kanpur Nagar thr...
Case Number: 832
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2014
Court Name: Jaunpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/247/20131. VIRENDRA KUMAR PANDEY S/o. AMARNATH PANDEY , MALIPUR UMARPUR , MACHLISAHAR , JAUNPUR BEFORE: For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERDISMISSED...
Case Number: 247
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. LEENA TUTEJA
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3750 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/11/2012 in Appeal No. 162/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. MAHARASHTRA TELECOM CIRCLE, BSNL & ANR.ADMN BUILDING, JUHU DANDA ROAD, SHANTACRUZ (WEST)MUMB...
Case Number: 3750
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/03/1385(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/08/2003 in Case No. CC/60/2003 of District Wardha)1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.through it's Telecom District Manager, WardhaTelecom Division, W...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/99/2126(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District Sindhudurg)1. SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER TELECOM KUDAL AND ORS.KUDAL...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SHRI. SURESH P. PRABHU...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-1999
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telecom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telecom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Telecom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.