
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurExecution Application No. EA/11/307 1. Amit Subhash KarandePadma Housing Society N.C.C. Office .Rajendra Nagar Road.Kolhapur. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Sony Ericssion MobileDakja House. 18/17.WFA Karol Bagh New Delhi 05 .........
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate J.R. Padmakumar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/09/2111. V.K. Suresh kumarPuliyarathala veedu, Chenkal p.o., ThiruvananthapramKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Chief Executive Officer, SONY India pvt LtdA-31, Mohan co-operative Industrial Estate, Mathura road, NewdelhiKerala2. The Branch in -cha...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/03/1812(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. First Appeal No. of District )1. A. P. CHOUDHARY,A-401, KANTI PARK, ASSOCIATE BANK OFFICER'S COLONY, SHIMPOLI RD., BORIVALI(W)...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/1261. MR NITIN CHHAZEDC/601, SONI PARK, CHIKOOWADI, BORIVLI-WEST, MUMBAI-92............Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY ERICSSO...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/2231. MR SHASHANK PANDEYMARINE ENGINEERING & RESEARCH INSTITUTE, HAY BUNDER ROAD, SEWRI, MUMBAI-400 033............Complai...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate K.S.Kuti
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/423 1. Rajinder singh @Shenkyson of Balwinder singh r/o MIG 575,Phase II,Model Town,...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.SREERAM
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/253(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/11/2010 in Case No. CC/06/306 of District Kozhikode)1. SONY INDIA LIMITEDA-31.MOHAN COOPERATIVE ESTATE,MATHURA ROADNEW DELHIDELHI...........App...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 743 of 2009 1. Reeta Sachdeva# 1056, 2nd Floor, Sector 40/B, Chandigarh. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 18 Nov 2011 ORDER BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.C...
Case Number: 743
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCRIMINAL PETITION NO. 92 of 2011 1. RahulS/o Sh. M.R.Sable R/o House No. 496 SEctor-29/A, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Head Custome Services Sony Ericson Mobile Communication India Pvt.Ltd.104, Time Tower Main M.G.Road, Sector...
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13 of 2011 1. Sh. Ashwani Anandaged 55 Sectors-7, Panchkula ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 02 Nov 2011 ORDER DISTRICT FORUM – ICRIMINAL COMPLAINT NO. 13 OF 2011INCON...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.