
Bajaj Allianz Bajaj Allianz Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Sony Bajaj
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate K.P PAULOSE MURIMATTAM
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2871. SONY C. AS/o ANDRECOS, CHAKKINATTU HOUSE, KARINGACHIRA, IRUMPANAM, ERNAKULAM.Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BAJAJ ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE Co. Ltd.40/8800 C, 2ND FLOOR, DEVAS, M G ROAD, NEAR PADMA Jn., ERNAKULAM.PIN - 682035Kerala...............
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumCivil Station,KottayamKeralaCC NO. 189 Of 20111. Suresh BabuValiyaparambil,Manthuruthy.P.O,NedukunnamKottayam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing Director Sony India Pvt.LtdReg.Office,A31,Mohan Co-Op Industrial Estate,Madura Road,New Del...
Case Number: 189
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 424 of 2011 1. Divyajyoti MehraR/o # 1501, Sector 33, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Sony EricsonC/o Tarvo Technologies Ltd, SCO 2473-74, 2nd Floor, Sector 22/C, Chandigarh, through Incharge/Manager-Sony Erics...
Case Number: 424
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANJAY UDESHI & CO
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/158(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/12/2010 in Case No. 709/09 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. M/S SONY INDIA PVT LTDO/AT A-31 MOHAN CO-OP ESTATE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHI NEW DELH...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Sanjay D
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/269/2010( Date of Filing : 29 Sep 2010 )1. AbhijithS.o. P. Monappa Poojary, r.at. Nandila, Puttur............Complainant(s)Versus1. Managing Director, Sony Ericsson MobileNew de...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2019
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 905 1. Yadwinder Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Sony India Pvt. Ltd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :In Person, Advocate for For the Respondent :Date...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 294 Of 20111. ARUN RAJ"SAHAR", AMBIKA STREET, CIVIL STATION PO, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673020...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PVT LTD.A-31, MOHAN CO OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MATHURA ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN 110044.2. THE MANAGER,QRS RETAIL LIMITED, OPP. MES WOMENS COLL...
Case Number: 294
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 599 of 2010 1. Sh. Sohan SinghR/o House No. 172-B Sector-51/A Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Sony India Pvt. Ltd,Headquarter: A-31, Mohan C...
Case Number: 599
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
puneAdditional consumer courtComplaint Case No. CC/11/7 1. Bhushan Jayantrao BhandareC/o. N.R. Pawar,I 501/Bharati Vihar BVp Campus, KatrajPuneMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The President Sony Ericsion Mobile Comunications Pvt. Ltd,GurgoanDelhi NCR,Haryana HaryanaDe...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 122 Of 20111. ATHUL K,KIYYALATH HOUSE,THALAKKULATHUR PO,KOZHIKODE...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY ERICSSON,2. FRIDGE HOUSE,OPP.MALABAR CHRISTIAN COLLEGE,LAKSHMI BUILDING,KANNUR ROAD,KOZHIKODE 6730013. ACCELDOOR NO.1297C,IST FLOOR,NEAR GEETHA AUTO MOBILE,EAST NADAKKAV...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.