company-name-logo

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Latest Judgments

Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

Kerala

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Cherian Zachariah

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Kottayam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamComplaint Case No. CC/229/20111. Cherian ZachariahKarunalayil Ashish Villa,Mariappally.P.O,Kottayam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEPF Orgn.CMS College Road,Kottayam2. Mangalam Publications India Pvt...

Case Number: 229

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Dinesh

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 749 of 2012 1. Dinesh S/o Sh. Shiv Nath, R/o # 559, Village, Hallomajra, UT, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Regional Provident Fund CommissionerSCO 4-7, Sector 17, Chandigarh2. M/s Laxmi Manufacturer, Plot ...

Case Number: 749

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

SATYAPAL MOHAL & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER INDORE

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate MR. VINOD KUMAR KANWAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 609 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/11/2011 in Appeal No. 179/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER INDORE28 Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, Wazirpur Industrial Are...

Case Number: 609

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2013

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Smt. Halimabi Ahsanullah Khan V/S Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Adv Tanna

Respondant Advocate Adv R. Pande

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/06/454(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/07/2005 in Case No. CC/03/407 of District None)1. Regional Provident Fund Com...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER V/S SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate NO ADV IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्‍हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SHRI MULCHAND K SHAH V/S THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S PARADES

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/5011. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER 341 BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN BANDRA EAST MUMBAI 400001MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SHRI MULCHA...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER V/S S.K. RAJENDRA

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3668 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 26/08/2011 in Appeal No. 162/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. S.K. RAJENDRAR/o ,No26/1-399, Near Veerabhadreshwara Swamy Temple, Hegadur, Immadihalli Post,...

Case Number: 3668

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2013

NCDRC

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR. V/S S.R. AZAD

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. BRIJESHWAR SINGH KANWAR

Respondant Advocate MR SHIVANATH MAHANTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1154/2007 of the State Commission Punjab)1. S.R. AZADS/o Sh Gorkhu Ram, R/o House No- 347/178 New Laxmi Puri, Salem TabriLudhianaPunjab.......

Case Number: 1134

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2013

NCDRC

VINOD CHANDRA & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER INDORE

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate MR. VINOD KUMAR KANWAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 607 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/11/2011 in Appeal No. 151/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER INDORE28 Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, Wazirpur Industrial Are...

Case Number: 607

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2013

NCDRC

LAL CHAND BALI & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER INDORE

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate MR. VINOD KUMAR KANWAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 608 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/11/2011 in Appeal No. 168/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER INDORE28 Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, Wazirpur Industrial Are...

Case Number: 608

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.