
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/205/2011( Date of Filing : 08 Jun 2011 )1. PILLI RAVI KUMARQUARTER NO. 1195/SECTOR-IV RK PURAM NEW DELHI 110022...........Complainant(s)Ve...
Case Number: 205
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-10-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC. 94/2016 Dated:In the matter of: Pawan Kumar J&K 21, 2nd Floor,Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092. ..……..COMPLAINANT...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.P. Srivastva
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1313/2015( Date of Filing : 29 Jun 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/10/2014 in Case No. C/09/2012 of District Muradabad-II)1. DRM Northran Rail...
Case Number: 1313
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARTY IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL No. 475/18JUDGMENT DATED:25.09.2018PRESENT : HON’BLE JUSTICE S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENTSHRI. T.S.P MOOSATH : JUDICIAL MEMBERSHRI. RANJIT. R : MEMBERV.C. Janardhanan,S/o late B...
Case Number: 475
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Mam Chand
Respondant Advocate Parmod Gupta
CC No.412 of 2017.Madhu Sudan vs. GM Northern Railway.Present:Complainant in person with Sh.Mam Chand Adv. Sh.Parmod Gupta, Adv. for OPs. The ld. counsel for the complainant along with complainant made a joint statement that due to some technical defect they wants to withdraw ...
Case Number: 412
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Adv. Shiti Jain Dutt
Respondant Advocate
The counsel for the complainant has stated that the complainant has received the payment and as such she has appended a note on the execution application that she withdraws the same being fully satisfied. In view of the aforesaid statement, this execution application under S...
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2018
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/476/2016( Date of Filing : 01 Nov 2016 )1. K.K ABDULLAKAYYELIKUNNUMEL ,CHUNGAM,THAMARASSERY PO,CALICUT-673573...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER,SOUTHERN RAILWAYRAILWAY...
Case Number: 476
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2018
Court Name: Bahraich
Appelant Advocate Shri Mohd. Akram Siddiq
Respondant Advocate
पत्रावली प्रस्तुत हुई। फोरम अपूर्ण होने के कारण परिवाद पत्र प्रकीर्ण के रूपमें दर्ज हुआ था। आज कोरम पूर्ण ...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC. 311/2015 Dated:In the matter of: Pankaj Bansal,S/o Late Colonel R.K. Bansal, “Shaurya Chakra”R/o 108/04, Sec-1,Pushp Vihar...
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2018
Court Name: Koraput
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Sri Subash Ch. Panda
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM KORAPUT AT JEYPORE,ODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/9/2018( Date of Filing : 30 Jan 2018 )1. Sri Sugda Murmu, O/o.The Civil Supplies OfficerAt/PO-Jeypore-764 004.KoraputOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Station Master, Jeypore Railwa...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.