company-name-logo

Omaxe

Latest Judgments

Total 1203 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Surinder Kansal

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file the same before the proper Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three ...

Case Number: 265

|

Date of Filing: 29-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. ltd, V/S Sushma Raheja and anr.

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sakshi

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.

At the time of arguments, it is stated by Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, on getting instructions from the Company Executive, that towards settlement of all claims of the complainants, the Opposite Parties shall pay an amount of Rs.2,30,000/- t...

Case Number: 687

|

Date of Filing: 13-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sunil Gupta

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate R S Randhawa,Adv.

Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:928 of 2016Date of Institution:16.12.2016Date of Decision:31.03.2017Sunil Gupta son of Sh.Inder Pal Gupta, resident of House No.5052/3, MHC, Manimajra, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u ...

Case Number: 928

|

Date of Filing: 16-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Kabir Sarin

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Satinder Singh Randhawa, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars either under Section 25 or Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the...

Case Number: 64

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shellender Singh

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Jasbir Singh Punia, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.

At the time of arguments, it transpires that against the order under execution dated 10.06.2016, the Decree Holder/complainant has gone in First Appeal No.876 of 2016, which was admitted on 02.08.2016 and was ordered to be listed in due course. The said fact has not been disclose...

Case Number: 112

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2017

NCDRC

M/S. OMAXE LTD. & 4 ORS. V/S NAVIN KUMAR

Omaxe  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. RAKESH KUMAR & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 665 OF 20171. NAVIN KUMARS-425, 3RD FLOOR, G.K.-IINEW DELHI-110048...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. OMAXE LTD. & 4 ORS.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 7, LOCAL SHOPPING CENTRE, KALKAJINEW DELHI-110019....

Case Number: 665

|

Date of Filing: 08-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jagdeep Singh

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:706 of 2016Date of Institution:18.10.2016Date of Decision:24.03.2017Jagdeep Singh son of Sh. Kuldeep Singh resident of House No.3548, Urban Estate, Jind (Haryana).……ComplainantV e r s u ...

Case Number: 706

|

Date of Filing: 18-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2017

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sukhdev Kumar

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Tajeshwar Singh,Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:455 of 2016Date of Institution:12.08.2016Date of Decision:22.03.2017Sukhdev Kumar son of Sh.Satpal Gupta, resident of House No.1451-A, Sector 39-B, Chandigarh.Geeta Garg wife of Sh.Sukhdev Kumar, resi...

Case Number: 455

|

Date of Filing: 12-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 23-03-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited & Others V/S Sushil Kumar & Others

Omaxe   Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Saurabh Gautam Adv.

Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:584 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:22.03.2017Sushil Kumar son of Sh.Chander Bhan Bansal, resident of House No.99, Sector 16, Panchkula.Sushil Kumar son of Sh.Ram Sarup, residenc...

Case Number: 584

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 23-03-2017

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. ltd. V/S Naresh Kumar Sharma

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders/complainants wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to take up the matter with the Judgment Debtors/Opposite Parties. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn....

Case Number: 94

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 21-03-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.