
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANANT AGARWAL, MS. CHARANJEET KAUR BHATIA & MS. MEENA BANSAL
Respondant Advocate M/S. PRAVIN BAHADUR & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2775 OF 20171. ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR.SRI KESRI DASS JAIN, RESIDENT OF H.NO. B-XII-1642, MOTI BAZAR,MALERKOTLA,PANJAB2. SMT RENU JAIN,W/O SRI ANIL KUMAR JAIN,RESIDENT OF H.NO.B-XII-1642, MOTI BAZAR, MALERKO...
Case Number: 2775
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2018
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. Lalit Kaushik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 447/2017( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2017 )1. Tejpal Singh S/o Sh. Gurcharan Singh R/o Lajpat Nagar, Delhi............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd.Subhash Chander Gogia, Director M2M Buildtech ...
Case Number: 447
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2018
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This execution application was filed, when cheque issued towards second installment payable on 15.12.2017 was dishonoured. It is stated that the said amount was transferred with penalty amount to the account of the decree holder/complainant. During pendency of this execution appl...
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KARTAR SINGH MALIK-1
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No : 58 of 2017Date of Institution: 03.02.2017Date of Decision : 12.03.2018Parveen Kumari daughter of Shri Rajinder Singh Lohchab, Resident of House No.1095, Sector 1, HUDA, Rohtak, now at Dwarka, Delhi. Co...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2018
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the parties that the matter stands settled. It has been agreed by the Opposite Parties to refund the entire amount deposited by the complainants with the Opposite Parties, with interest @8% p.a. from the respective dates of deposit. The entire payment,...
Case Number: 634
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After hearing Counsel for the decree holder, we are of the opinion that the matter qua execution will be looked into only when the judgment debtors communicate their opinion regarding legal notice issued by the decree holder. Legal notice dated 19.09.2017 is at Annexure A-14....
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, it is stated by Counsel for the parties that the matter has amicably been settled. As per the Agreement signed between the parties, end date to hand over of possession of a developed plot was fixed at 30.08.2014. Admittedly, there is a delay in handing o...
Case Number: 492
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. SAVINDER SINGH GILL & MR. ANANT AGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1299 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 22/08/2016 in Complaint No. 63/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/AUTHORISED SI...
Case Number: 1299
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2427 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 13/10/2017 in Complaint No. 167/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. OMAXE LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS REGIONAL HEAD, HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE, NOWT ATT: INDIA T...
Case Number: 2427
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJESH VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 20/03/2017 in Complaint No. 768/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 10...
Case Number: 1218
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.