Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1203 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
OMAXE NORTH AVENUE V/S SHWETA TUTEJA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUKAND GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 784 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 05.12.2017 Date of Decision: 16.01.2018[Shweta Tuteja wife of Rajesh Tuteja, resident of House No.13/96, Dharampura, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, Haryana.&hel...
Case Number: 784
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Mr. Rakesh Kumar
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
The Decree holders/complainants have moved a Miscellaneous Application bearing No.1217 of 2017 also listed for today, for withdrawal of present execution application. It is stated that the facilities have not been provided at the spot, as such, it is not possible to live in the u...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
OMAXE LTD. V/S JYOTI MALHAN & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAHUL RATHORE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3870 OF 20171. JYOTI MALHAN & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. OMAXE LTD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER For the Complainant :Ms. Priyanjali Singh, ...
Case Number: 3870
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Ltd. V/S Mohit Goyal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Counsel for the parties state that the matter has amicably been settled. Sh. Pankaj Khullar, Advocate, proxy for Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties on getting instructions from Sh.Deepanjit Singh, Deputy Manager (Legal) of the Company states that the Op...
Case Number: 406
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Ltd. V/S Mrs. Renu Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Mandeep Singh Khillan, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party, on getting instructions from Sh. Deepanjit Singh, Deputy Manager (Legal), states that the Opposite Party shall refund the deposited amount of Rs.21,45,000/- alongwith simple interest @8% p.a. from the respective...
Case Number: 560
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sukhdev Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Towards full and final settlement of all the claims raised by the decree holders/complainants, Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the judgment debtors has handed over two cheques bearing Nos.870787 & 870788, both dated 07.10.2017, in the sum of Rs.5139/- each to ...
Case Number: 316
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Krishan Kumar Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sud, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed on dishonouring of post-dated cheque handed over by the judgment debtor to the decree holder. Today, in Court, demand draft bearing No.025654 dated 18.12.2017 in the sum of Rs.23,50,000/- has been handed over to the Counsel for the...
Case Number: 425
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2017
M/S. OMAXE LTD. V/S P.P. GAMBHIR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 861 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 06/12/2016 in Appeal No. 124/2014 of the State Commission Delhi)1. P.P. GAMBHIRE-340, GREATER KAILASH II,NEW DELHI-110048...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. M/S. OMAXE ...
Case Number: 861
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2018
M/S. OMAXE LTD. V/S SANJIV KUMAR GAMBHIR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 862 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 06/12/2016 in Appeal No. 125/2014 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SANJIV KUMAR GAMBHIRE-340, GREATER KAILASH II,NEW DELHI-110048...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. M/S...
Case Number: 862
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. V/S Vibhas Kaushal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Geeta Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. Sh.Munish Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party states that for delay in handing over of possession w.e.f. 21.7.2015 till 17.08.2017 the Opposite Party shall pay interest @8% p.a. on the amount deposited by the c...
Case Number: 197
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.